0
$\begingroup$

I'm doing a metric spaces course and got stuck on proposition. I have a feeling that I want to show that $A$ is bounded and closed then use Heine-Borel theorem. The proposition states that $f$ is bounded and attains its bounds so I don't know how to show that $A$ is bounded and closed. It just seems obvious and I seem to be going around in a circular argument.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your question is not clear. What do you have to prove? What are $A, C$? $\endgroup$ – Crostul Nov 4 '14 at 18:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Crostul Sorry. I have edited it now :) $\endgroup$ – user120227 Nov 4 '14 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/questions/114123/… $\endgroup$ – Max Nov 4 '14 at 18:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I will post an easier proof without using Tietze's theorem. $\endgroup$ – Crostul Nov 4 '14 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ thank you both of you. I think I do need an easier proof $\endgroup$ – user120227 Nov 4 '14 at 18:17
2
$\begingroup$

we are given that $A\subset \mathbb R^n$. In order to show that $A$ is compact, it suffices to show that $A$ is bounded and closed.

$A$ is bounded. Clearly the function $f:A\to\mathbb R$, with $f(x)=\|x\|$ is continuous, and as it has to be bounded, then there exists an $M>0$, such that $f(x)=\|x\|\le M$, for all $x\in A$. But this means that $A$ is bounded.

$A$ is closed. If not, then there exists a sequence $\{x_n\}_{n\in\mathbb N}\subset A$, with $x_n\to x_0\not\in A$. Then the function $\,f:A\to\mathbb R$, with $$ f(x)=\frac{1}{\|x-x_0\|}, $$
in continuous and unbounded. A contradiction, and hence $A$ is closed.

Altogether, indeed $A$ is compact.

Note. The function $g(x)=\|x-x_0\|$ is continuous, but it does not attain a minimum. The infimum of $f$ is equal to zero, while $f$ takes only positive values.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $f$ should be $f(y) = \|x-y\|^{-1}$. $\endgroup$ – daw Nov 4 '14 at 20:29
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis Nov 4 '14 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ @YiorgosS.Smyrlis, is $f(x) = \frac{1}{\Vert x- x_{0} \Vert}$ also an example of a function that does not attain its minimum? If not, what would be one? $\endgroup$ – ALannister May 3 '16 at 17:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JessyCat See my edited answer. $\endgroup$ – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis May 4 '16 at 10:21
2
$\begingroup$

Let $B \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ be any bounded subset. Then "$B$ attains its bounds" means that $B$ is closed.

Call $C(A)= \{ f: \mathbb{R}^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{R} \mbox{ continuous functions} \} $. Then

$$A = \bigcap_{f \in C(A)} f^{-1}(f(A))$$

Since for all $f \in C(A)$ $f(A)$ is closed, $f^{-1}(f(A))$ is closed as well (because $f$ is continuous). So, $A$ is an intersection of closed sets, hence it is closed.

Finally, consider for all $i=1, \dots, n$ the continuous functions $$\pi_i :A \longrightarrow \mathbb{R} \ \ \ \ \ (x_1, \dots, x_n) \mapsto x_i$$

Since all the sets $\{\pi_i(A) \}_{i=1}^n$ are bounded, then so is their product $\prod_{i=1}^n \pi_i(A) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. But $A \subseteq \prod_{i=1}^n \pi_i(A)$, so it is bounded.

Being closed and bounded, $A$ is compact.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $B=[0,1)\cup(1,2]$, attains its bound, but it is not closed! $\endgroup$ – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis Nov 4 '14 at 18:38
  • $\begingroup$ @YiorgosS.Smyrlis You are right! My proof is in some sense incomplete... =( $\endgroup$ – Crostul Nov 4 '14 at 18:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.