An integral by O. Furdui $\int_0^1 \log^2(\sqrt{1+x}-\sqrt{1-x}) \ dx$ The following integral was proposed in a paper by O. Furdui, namely 
$$\int_0^1 \log^2(\sqrt{1+x}-\sqrt{1-x}) \ dx$$
and then the generalization 
$$\int_0^1 \log^2(\sqrt[k]{1+x}-\sqrt[k]{1-x}) \ dx$$
As regards the first integral, my approach was to combine the integration by parts and the variable change,  that is $\sqrt{1+x}-\sqrt{1-x} \mapsto x$, and then we get another integral that can be decomposed into $2$ integrals where the hardest part gets reduced to computing 
$$\int_0^{\sqrt{2}/2}\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x} \ dx$$
that is pretty straightforward by variable change combined with the integration by parts.  
And here is a supplementary question
$$\int_0^1 \log^3(\sqrt{1+x}-\sqrt{1-x}) \ dx$$
I'd be also interested in other approaching ways if possible.
 A: This response may be unnecessary after M.N.C.E.'s nice answer, but for what it's worth here's an alternative approach.
Let's start by transforming the integral via the following Euler substitution:
$$\sqrt{1-x^2}=1-xt.$$
Solving for the variable $t$ as a function of $x$ and vice versa, we find,
$$t=\frac{1-\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x},$$
and
$$x=\frac{2t}{1+t^2}.$$
The advantage of this substitution over the one suggested in the question statement is that it quickly converts the integrand to a product of a rational function and the logarithm (squared) of a rational function. A single integration by parts can then reduce the power of the logarithm to $1$:
$$\begin{align}
\mathcal{I}
&=\int_{0}^{1}\ln^2{\left(\sqrt{1+x}-\sqrt{1-x}\right)}\,\mathrm{d}x\\
&=\int_{0}^{1}\ln^2{\left(\frac{|1+t|}{\sqrt{1+t^2}}-\frac{|1-t|}{\sqrt{1+t^2}}\right)}\cdot\frac{2(1-t^2)}{(1+t^2)^2}\,\mathrm{d}t\\
&=2\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-t^2)}{(1+t^2)^2}\ln^2{\left(\frac{1+t-1+t}{\sqrt{1+t^2}}\right)}\,\mathrm{d}t\\
&=2\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-t^2)}{(1+t^2)^2}\ln^2{\left(\frac{2t}{\sqrt{1+t^2}}\right)}\,\mathrm{d}t\\
&=\frac12\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(1-t^2)}{(1+t^2)^2}\ln^2{\left(\frac{4t^2}{1+t^2}\right)}\,\mathrm{d}t\\
&=\left[\frac{t}{1+t^2}\ln^2{\left(\frac{4t^2}{1+t^2}\right)}\right]_{0}^{1}-\frac12\int_{0}^{1}\frac{t}{1+t^2}\cdot\frac{4\ln{\left(\frac{4t^2}{1+t^2}\right)}}{t(1+t^2)}\,\mathrm{d}t\\
&=\frac{\ln^2{(2)}}{4}-2\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\ln{\left(\frac{4t^2}{1+t^2}\right)}}{(1+t^2)^2}\,\mathrm{d}t.\\
\end{align}$$
The last integral of course can be systematically evaluated in terms of dilogarithms.
A: 
I'd be also interested in other approaching ways, if possible.

Too long for a comment:


*

*On one hand, x varies in between $0$ and $1$, implying a trigonometric substitution.

*On the other hand, expressions of the form $\sqrt{1\pm x}$ automatically bring to mind the famous trigonometric formulas $\dfrac{1+\cos2t}2=\cos^{2}t$ and $\dfrac{1-\cos2t}2=\sin^2t$.

*On the third hand, we notice that exactly two out of the three possible types of conic sections are present in our integrand: hyperbolas, represented by the natural logarithm, whose derivative the hyperbola is; and parabolas, represented by the two square roots. Now, recalling that in almost all of Agatha Christie's mystery novels the culprit is precisely the character one least suspects, we are thereby inclined to suspect that a substitution relating to the third and mysteriously absent conic section, the circle, might be in order.

*On the fourth hand, if life has taught me anything over the past few months, it's that it is not the actual, literal mathematical expressions which appear in an integrand that one should pay attention to $($since they are nothing more than mere masks and false appearances, meant to conceal their true identity, and deceive the audience, like the pretty, half-dressed show-girls in an illusionist's act, diverting the public's attention away from the latter's sleight of hand, and preventing them from discovering his tricks$)$, but rather the value-domain which they occupy, and the way in which they relate to each other. In this particular case, it is really hard not to notice that $\Big(\sqrt{1+x}\Big)^2+\Big(\sqrt{1-x}\Big)^2=2$. Does any particular trigonometric formula come to mind ?
A: For the generalized integral 
\begin{align}
\int_{0}^{1} \ln^{2}\left( \sqrt[k]{1+x} - \sqrt[k]{1-x} \right) \, dx
\end{align}
one possible result, although not readily seen to be reducible in a quick manor, can be shown to be
\begin{align}
& \int_{0}^{1} \ln^{2}(\sqrt[k]{1+x} - \sqrt[k]{1-x} ) \, dx \nonumber\\
& \hspace{5mm} = \frac{2(1 - \ln 2)^{2}}{k^{2}} + \frac{2}{k} \, \sum_{r, s = 1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{s}}
{r \, s(s+1)} \, F_{1}\left( s+2; - \frac{r}{k}, \frac{r}{k}; s+2; 1, -1 \right) \nonumber\\
& \hspace{5mm} + 2 k \, \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{r-1} \, H_{r}}{(r+1)(r+k+1)} \, {}_{2}F_{1}
\left( 1, \frac{r+1}{k} ; \frac{r+2k+1}{k} ; -1 \right)
\end{align}
where $F_{1}$ is Appell's hypergeometric function, ${}_{2}F_{1}$ is Gauss' hypergeometric function and $H_{n}$ is the Harmonic number. 
