1
$\begingroup$

This seems like a very natural category of polyhedron to have, and would encompass a lot of things like the Platonic and Archimedean solids and more, but I haven't been able to find a name for it anywhere.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There is a term called isotoxal, meaning that there exists a symmetry, which acts on all edges transitvely, cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotoxal_figure.

The prefix iso- always unites into a single equivalence class. If you just wan to tell that those are alike (here: by size), then you could use the prefix equi- instead.

--- rk

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Symmetry is another story. With some effort, we may produce a polyhedron with edges of same length, but without any symmetry at all. $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2019 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, this is why I added equitoxal instead of the more restrictive isotoxal too. $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2019 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ If you'd like other further restrictions, like overall convexity plus regularity of the polygonal faces, then in 3D you would just encompass the well-known set of Johnson solids, cf. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_solid. Within 4D this same restriction would result in what is understood by the acronym CRF (convex regular faced polychora), e.g. cf. bendwavy.org/klitzing/explain/johnson.htm#crf. $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2019 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ equilateral would be equally (sic) acceptable. $\endgroup$ Mar 19, 2020 at 13:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .