7
$\begingroup$

Let $A,B$, be rings, $I\subset A$ an ideal, and $A\rightarrow B$ be faithfully flat ring homomorphism. Show that $IB\cap A=I$.

By our assumptions, I know that for any $A$-module $M$, we have an injection $M\rightarrow M\otimes_A B$, given by $m\mapsto m\otimes 1$. I've read we could apply $M=A/I$ to this, so I guess we get an injection $A/I \rightarrow A/I\otimes_A B\cong B/IB$ but I don't really see how this will do any good?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ How do you know that for ever $A$-module $M$ there is an injection $M\to M\otimes_A B$? This would be the same as saying that $A\to B$ is mono, which I cannot see. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2018 at 22:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Because it seems that if you have the statement above, then $IB\cap A$ is a kernel of $A/I\to B/IB$ and the equality says that this map is an injection. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2018 at 22:19
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe I should've mentoined it's an injection defined by $m\mapsto m\otimes 1$. It's stated in Matsumuras Commutative Ring Theory theorem 7.5 page 49 $\endgroup$
    – Mictej
    May 31, 2018 at 22:39

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

First of all, as there was confusion in the comments, let us quickly show the claim that $A \rightarrow B$ is universally injective if $A \rightarrow B$ is faithfully flat (i.e. for any $A$-module $M$, the induced morphism $M \rightarrow B \otimes_A M$ is injective).

Take $M$ to be any $A$-module and consider $M \rightarrow M \otimes_A B$. As $B$ is faithfully flat over $A$, we can show injectivity after tensoring with $B$. That is, we have to show $M \otimes_A B \rightarrow M \otimes_A B \otimes_A B$, $m \otimes b \mapsto m \otimes 1 \otimes b$ is injective. But this morphism has a section $M \otimes_A B \otimes_A B \rightarrow M \otimes_A B$, $m \otimes b \otimes b' \mapsto m \otimes bb'$, and we're done with the claim.

Now the statement of the exercise. It is clear that $I \subseteq IB \cap A$. Further, let us write $\varphi \colon A \rightarrow B$ for the given faithfully flat morphism. We have by definition $IB \cap A = \varphi^{-1}(IB)$. Tensoring $\varphi$ with $A/IA$ we obtain an injection $\varphi \colon A/IA \rightarrow B/IB$, which translates to $\mathrm{ker}(A \rightarrow B \rightarrow B/IB) \subseteq I$, which in turn translates to $\varphi^{-1}(IB) \subseteq I$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ How does $ker(A\rightarrow B\rightarrow B/IB\subseteq I)$ translate to $\phi^{-1}(IB)\subseteq I$? $\endgroup$
    – Mictej
    Jun 5, 2018 at 11:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By definition, $ker(A \rightarrow B \rightarrow B/IB) = \{ a \in A \mid \varphi(a) \in IB \} = \varphi^{-1}(IB)$. $\endgroup$
    – Louis
    Jun 5, 2018 at 11:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .