1
$\begingroup$

I was reading Mark Hovey's "Model Categories".

In the proof of the proposition 1.2.5. (iv) (page 11), it says we can see that when $B$ is cofibrant and $h:X\to Y$ is a weak equivalence of fibrant objects, $h$ induces an isomorphism $$\mathcal{C}(B, X)/\overset{\ell}\sim\xrightarrow{\cong}\mathcal{C}(B, Y)/\overset{\ell}\sim $$ using Ken Brown's lemma and the case in which $h$ is a trivial fibration.

It seems that this is a basic argument (similar one is found in the first paraghraph of the proof of the proposition 1.2.8). How can I use Ken Brown's lemma in these proofs?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

K.B. says that any functor $F:M\to C$ from a model category to a category with a class of weak equivalences satisfying 2-for-3 which sends trivial (co)fibrations between (co)fibrant objects to weak equivalences must send all weak equivalences between (co)fibrant objects to weak equivalences. We have the functor $C(B,-)$, which we already know sends trivial fibrations to "weak equivalences of sets", that is, isomorphisms, after modding out left homotopy. The result follows.

I think Hovey may only state K.B. for model categories as codomain as well, but the proof won't use that. Anyway, you can take a trivial model structure on sets in this case, if you want.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks! Hovey stated the general case, but I didn't come up with this simple usage. $\endgroup$
    – nrkm
    Feb 4, 2017 at 16:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .