1
$\begingroup$

In the course of working on an exercise, I came up with the claim given in the title. Just looking for verification.

$\underline{\text{Claim: } A\text{ is totally disconnected}\iff A^\circ=\emptyset.}$

$\underline{\implies}$

Let $x\in A$, $\epsilon>0$ and $U=(x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon)$. Since $U\cap A$ is not connected, $U\cap (\Bbb R\setminus A)\ne\emptyset$ and therefore, $x\notin A^\circ$.

$\underline{\impliedby}$

Let $x,y\in A$ with $x<y$. Suppose there is a connected set $B\subseteq A$ such that $x,y\in B$. Since, $(x,y)$ is connected, $(x,y)\subseteq B\subseteq A$. This contradicts that $A^\circ=\emptyset$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Ah. Yes. Let me change the hypothesis. $\endgroup$ Jul 29, 2015 at 15:28

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I would modify the proof a bit. In the first sentence you could write

Let $x∈A, ϵ>0$ and $U=(x−ϵ,x+ϵ)$. Since $U∩A$ $\color{red}{\text{is a singleton}}$ or is not connected, $U∩(ℝ∖A)≠∅$ and therefore, $x∉A^∘$.

The other direction is fine.

I think you don't need the hypothesis that $|A|\ge 2$. If $A$ is a single point, then it's totally disconnected since the components are singletons in that case.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the suggestion. $\endgroup$ Jul 29, 2015 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ @TimRaczkowski: I think it also holds for $|A|=1$ as then the component is a single point. However, I'm not sure if $A$ must be disconnected in order to be totally disconnected. That's of course just a matter of how you define it. $\endgroup$ Jul 29, 2015 at 15:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .