1
$\begingroup$

There already questions such as $1 + 1 + 1 +\cdots = -\frac{1}{2}$ and Why does $1+2+3+\cdots = -\frac{1}{12}$? which show how $\zeta(0)$ and $\zeta(-1)$ can be calculated.

What are some ways to evaluate the Riemann zeta function at any negative integer that appears to have a direct correlation to $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1{n^s}$? That is to say, results that can be attained by manipulating this series somewhat directly. So not things such as the reflection formula or the Bernoulli numbers which don't seem to relate to the above series.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Took a quick search but didn't find a dupe, but perhaps there is one I'm not aware of... $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2019 at 11:36
  • $\begingroup$ This page from the OEIS wiki gives the formula $\zeta(-s) = 2^{-s} \pi^{-s-1} \sin \left(-\frac{\pi s}{2} \right) \Gamma(1+s) \zeta(1+s)$ for $\Re(s) > 0$. $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2019 at 13:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @automaticallyGenerated, I am pretty sure that OP already know the methods using reflection formula and/or the Bernoulli numbers, as he/she is explicitly asking an answer which does not use them. $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2019 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I see. I should have read the question more carefully. $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2019 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ In that case, try looking at this $\endgroup$ Sep 4, 2019 at 14:34

3 Answers 3

5
$\begingroup$

One can relate the Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$ to the Dirichlet eta function $\eta(s)$ using

$$ (1-2^{1-s})\zeta(s) =(1-2^{1-s})\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^s} =\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^s} =\eta(s)$$

which follows quite easily by multiplying out the LHS. This identity holds a priori for $s > 1$, and then extends to all of $s\in\mathbb{C}$ by the principle of analytic continuation. Moreover,

$$\eta(s) =\lim_{x\to-1^+}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{x^{n-1}}{n^s}. \tag{1}$$

Indeed, Abel's theorem immediately establish this for $s > 0$, where $\eta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^s}$ holds, and a more delicate argument shows that this identity continues to hold for all of $s\in\mathbb{C}$. Using this, we get

$$\zeta(0) =-\lim_{x\to-1^+}\sum_{n=1}^\infty x^{n-1} =-\lim_{x\to-1^+}\frac{1}{1-x} =-\frac{1}{2}$$

$$\zeta(-1) =-\frac{1}{3}\lim_{x\to-1^+}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} nx^{n-1} =-\frac{1}{3}\lim_{x\to-1^+}\frac{1}{(1-x)^2} =-\frac{1}{12}$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This very interesting identity can also be written in the form $$\operatorname{Li}_s(-1)=(2^{1-s}-1)\cdot\zeta(s)$$ where $\operatorname{Li}_s$ is a Polylogarithm. This is interesting because $$\operatorname{Li}_s(1)=\zeta(s)$$ for $\Re s>1$ $\endgroup$ Dec 27, 2019 at 0:37
2
$\begingroup$

$$\zeta(s) =\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}=\sum_{n=1}^\infty s\int_1^\infty x^{-s}dx=s \int_1^\infty \lfloor x\rfloor x^{-s-1}dx= \frac{s}{s-1}+\frac12-s \int_1^\infty (x-\lfloor x\rfloor-\frac12)x^{-s-1}dx$$

$$B_0(x)=x-\frac12,\qquad {B_{k+1}}'(x)=B_k(x),\qquad\int_1^2 B_{k+1}(x)dx=0$$

By induction starting with $k=0$, for $\Re(s) > -k$ $$\zeta(s)=\frac{s}{s-1}-\sum_{m=0}^k B_m(1)(\prod_{l=0}^m (s+l))- (\prod_{l=0}^k (s+l)) \int_1^\infty B_k(x-\lfloor x\rfloor)x^{-s-1-k}dx$$ (integration by parts) $$ =\frac{s}{s-1}-\sum_{m=0}^{k+1}B_m(1)(\prod_{l=0}^m (s+l))-( \prod_{l=0}^{k+1} (s+l) )\int_1^\infty B_{k+1}(x-\lfloor x\rfloor)x^{-s-1-(k+1)}dx$$

Whence

$$\zeta(-N)=\frac{-N}{-N-1}-\sum_{m=0}^N B_m(1)\prod_{l=0}^m (-N+l)$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Right. I don't guarantee there are no other mistakes, it is hard to play with such indices and I didn't check $\zeta(0),\zeta(-1)$, but the method involving Bernouilli is standard $\endgroup$
    – reuns
    Sep 4, 2019 at 22:29
2
$\begingroup$

A self-contained approach. One might start with $$ \zeta(s)=\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{n^s} = \frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{+\infty}\frac{x^{s-1}}{e^x-1}\,dx $$ where the series and the integral are convergent over $\text{Re}(s)>1$. An analytic continuation over a larger subset of $\mathbb{C}$ can be achieved by applying IBP multiple times: for instance $$ \frac{1}{(s-1)\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{+\infty}x^{s-1}\cdot-\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{x}{e^x-1}\right)\,dx $$ provides an analytic continuation over $\text{Re}(s)>0$ and $$ \frac{(-1)^{k}}{(s-1)\Gamma(s+k+1)}\int_{0}^{+\infty}x^{s+k}\cdot\frac{d^{k+2}}{dx^{k+2}}\left(\frac{x}{e^x-1}\right)\,dx $$ provides an analytic continuation over $\text{Re}(s)>-(k+1)$. In particular, by picking $s=-k$ in the above line, $$ \zeta(-k)=\frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{k+1}\int_{0}^{+\infty}\frac{d^{k+2}}{dx^{k+2}}\left(\frac{x}{e^x-1}\right)\,dx =\frac{(-1)^k}{k+1}\cdot\left.\frac{d^{k+1}}{dx^{k+1}}\left(\frac{x}{e^x-1}\right)\right|_{x=0}$$ from which it follows that the values of the Riemann zeta function over the non-positive integers can be computed from the Maclaurin series of $\frac{x}{e^x-1}$. Since $$ \frac{x}{e^x-1}=-\frac{x}{2}+\underbrace{\frac{x}{2}\coth\frac{x}{2}}_{\text{even function}}$$ we have that $\zeta(-2n)=0$ for any $n\in\mathbb{N}^+$, and $\zeta(0)=-\frac{1}{2}$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ @SimplyBeautifulArt: right, now fixed. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2019 at 0:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ +1 very nice direct proof of the relation to the Bernoulli numbers via the coefficients of $x/(e^x-1)$'s Maclaurin series. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2019 at 0:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .