0
$\begingroup$

Suppose $X = \theta{Y}$ for some $\theta>0$ with $Y∼Beta(8,1)$. What is the maximum likelihood estimator for $\hat{\theta}=\hat{\theta}(x)$?

The distribution function I got is $f_\theta(x) = \frac{8x^7}{\theta^8}$ on range$[0,\frac{1}{\theta}]$, but by taking the derivative of the log likelihood function for this distribution by $\theta$ does not work.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Taking a derivative is not going to work because the support of the random variable $X$ depends on the unknown parameter $\theta.$ // A somewhat similar task is to find the MLE for $\theta$ based on data from $\mathsf{Unif}(0,\theta)$. In that case the MLE is the largest observation out of $n$. That case is widely discussed in statistics books and on this site. $\endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Feb 17, 2018 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ thank you for your reply! i got the idea of finding MLE for $\theta$ but is it ok not to take Y into consideration at all? $\endgroup$
    – Serena
    Feb 17, 2018 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure what you mean. $X$ is defined in terms of $Y,$ so in that sense $Y$ can't be ignored. However both shape parameters of $Y$ are known, so there is nothing about its distribution to be estimated. $\endgroup$
    – BruceET
    Feb 18, 2018 at 8:10
  • $\begingroup$ Taking derivative is fine as long as you are aware of that the maximum may not be in the interior point - as in this case it is located in the boundary. $\endgroup$
    – BGM
    Feb 18, 2018 at 8:55

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In problems like these you can still use ordinary calculus methods; you have a monotonic likelihood function with the MLE occurring at a boundary point. This gives rise to a biased estimator of the parameter value, which can then be adjusted to obtain a non-biased estimator. In your particular problem (with a single observation $x$) you have the log-likelihood function:

$$\ell_x (\theta) = -8 \ln \theta <0 \quad \quad \text{for all }\theta \geqslant x.$$

Since the log-likelihood is a decreasing function, the MLE occurs at the boundary point $\hat{\theta} = x$. It can easily be shown that this is a biased estimator with mean $\mathbb{E}(\hat{\theta}) = \tfrac{8}{9} \cdot \theta$, and so you can obtain an unbiased adjusted-MLE using the estimator $\tilde{\theta} = \tfrac{9}{8} \cdot x$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .