meta user
network profile
| bio | website | WWW.PRINCETON.EDU/~rghanta |
|---|---|---|
| location | Princeton, NJ | |
| age | 16 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | Dec 31 '12 at 8:29 | |
| stats | profile views | 286 |
Hi, my name is Bob and I approve this message!
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Book advice to brush up on Calculus and PDEs I'm glad you find this of some help! |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
suggest textbook on calculus @george: I am glad that you have found Titu's book helpful. I think it is also a good way for you to get introduced to analysis. |
|
Sep 12 |
answered | Book advice to brush up on Calculus and PDEs |
|
Sep 11 |
revised |
suggest textbook on calculus grammar |
|
Sep 11 |
revised |
suggest textbook on calculus added 132 characters in body |
|
Sep 11 |
answered | suggest textbook on calculus |
|
Sep 7 |
comment |
Quantum mechanics for mathematicians I am using Takhtajan's book right now. Dirac's book is indeed very frustrating. |
|
Sep 7 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Sep 7 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Sep 6 |
revised |
How could contour integration be represented as a number? grammatical errors made it sound awkward |
|
Sep 6 |
suggested | suggested edit on How could contour integration be represented as a number? |
|
Sep 6 |
revised |
How could contour integration be represented as a number? LaTeX errors (minor); doesn't hurt to fix |
|
Sep 6 |
revised |
How could contour integration be represented as a number? grammatical errors made it sound awkward |
|
Sep 6 |
suggested | suggested edit on How could contour integration be represented as a number? |
|
Sep 6 |
answered | Quantum mechanics for mathematicians |
|
Aug 20 |
accepted | What is Fourier Analysis on Groups and does it have “applications” to physics? |
|
Aug 19 |
asked | What is Fourier Analysis on Groups and does it have “applications” to physics? |
|
Jul 30 |
comment |
A problem about Field extension I think people here will be generally more willing to help you if you show them that you've sufficiently thought about this question by telling them how you would go about or start the proof. Otherwise, it just looks like a homework problem you're just throwing at us to solve on your behalf. |
|
Jul 25 |
accepted | Riesz Lemma to the Riesz Representation Theorem |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Riesz Lemma to the Riesz Representation Theorem Thanks Theo. Do you then think there is any point in proving the converse I stated above: for each y∈H, then there exists an unique Ty∈H such that Ty(x)=(y,x) ∀x∈H. ? |
