3,978 reputation
330
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 10 months
seen Jan 26 at 15:21

I am a PhD student in Physics that studies math as a hobby.

My current mathematical interests involve p-adic and adelic numbers and in particular their applications to alternative formulations of quantum mechanics that do not have a "preferred" number system.

My favorite mathematical proof is Euler's solution of the Basel problem using the infinite product representation of the sinc function.


Jan
26
comment An apparent contradiction in SU(3) structure constants?
You can't permute the indices like you would in SU(2). Looking at the table you have for the structure constant you should notice that the only $f^{ijk}$ which has a $4$ and a $5$ is $f^{458}$. This means that the commutator of $0.5 \lambda_4$ and $0.5 \lambda_5$ will be proportional to $\lambda_8$ not $\lambda_3$.
Jan
24
revised How to prove that $f$ is differentiable at every point beside $x=-1$?
added 965 characters in body
Jan
24
answered How to prove that $f$ is differentiable at every point beside $x=-1$?
Jan
18
answered Proof for the curl of a curl of a vector field
Jan
5
comment Showing that $ \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left( 1 + \frac{r}{n} \right)^{n} = e^{r} $.
Yes that is a good point.
Jan
5
comment An improper integrals related to probability, $\int_0^\infty\frac1y \exp(\frac{-x_0}y-y)\,dy$
This is an integration with respect to $y$?
Dec
19
awarded  Caucus
Oct
31
comment Is this derivative of $\frac{\partial x}{\partial P}$ correct?
Seems like your using some sort of specialized notation/jargon. Its if you are then it would be useful to provide some definitions. There might be a more appropriate tag to indicate what field this falls in.
Oct
31
comment $4^x \equiv 1 \pmod{105 }$. Find the smallest integer $x$ and verify that $x$ divides 105
6 is certainly the smallest positive integer which satisfies the congruence which can be seen on wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4%5En-floor%284%5En%2F105%29*105+for+n%3D1+‌​to+10 . We can all see that 6 doesn't divide 105. It seems to me that you need to get some clarification on what the question actually is.
Oct
31
comment How to determine the nature of a series
Agreed, I didn't want to get into the details. There is enough here that the OP or someone else can fill in the rest.
Oct
31
answered How to determine the nature of a series
Oct
31
comment How to determine the nature of a series
What is your goal here? Are you trying to sum the series or just establish convergence?
Oct
29
answered Find a matrix transformation mapping $\{(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,0,2)\}$ to $\{(1,1,1),(0,1,0),(1,0,1)\}$
Oct
28
reviewed Reject Normal distribution problem - “6 times the standard deviation”
Oct
27
comment When does sum to infinity starts getting negative?
The sum you are referring to has a very technical way of interpreting that sum via an "analytic continuation". When it comes to infinite sums there are different conventions for interpreting them which give different results. Your intuition isn't wrong you're just using a different convention for how to interpret the sum.
Oct
26
comment When is it insufficient to treat the Dirac delta as an evaluation map?
-mathematical discrepancy. If your interested in a rigorous treatment of the sequence definition then I can recommend M.J. Lighthill's book "An introduction to Fourier analysis and generalised functions"; its only 75 pages and very direct.
Oct
26
comment When is it insufficient to treat the Dirac delta as an evaluation map?
I'm not sure how far the theory of generalised functions has been developed. I know that in elementary situations like this one it is a good minimalist rigorous theory of delta functions. There may be contexts in which it hasn't even been developed since the theory of distributions is already there. The point I'm making here is that when they are equivalent there may be reasons of personal preference to use one over another since different formalisms can provide different insights. Obviously I can't make a sweeping statement that one is always better than another unless there is an objective-
Oct
26
comment When is it insufficient to treat the Dirac delta as an evaluation map?
I don't disagree that thinking of the delta function as an evaluation map is sufficient. I think that having multiple (rigorous) interpretations of the delta function can be helpful. I think this is similar to the idea of a tangent space in differential geometry, I know at least 4 equivalent definitions of the tangent space of a point $p$ in a manifold, but they all evoke completely different images of whats going on (for me at least).
Oct
26
revised When is it insufficient to treat the Dirac delta as an evaluation map?
added 768 characters in body
Oct
26
comment When is it insufficient to treat the Dirac delta as an evaluation map?
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez, there is an elementary treatment of the delta function promoted by M.J.Lighthill. In this context the delta function is an example of a "generalised function" which are equivalence classes of sequences of "Good Functions".