922 reputation
2829
bio website n/a
location Victoria
age 26
visits member for 2 years
seen Jan 17 at 1:06

Don't know much of anything bout nothing.

i up-vote pretty much everything i feel contributes to the site.


1d
awarded  Yearling
Jan
5
awarded  Famous Question
Jan
3
awarded  Custodian
Jan
2
accepted Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Jan
2
comment Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Oh! Thank you for taking the time to re-write that I totally follow how it proves it for all values now.
Jan
2
accepted Difficulty involving Rings and Subrings Proving lub contained in fields?
Jan
2
accepted Absolute convergence.
Jan
2
accepted continiouty of maping from set back into itself.
Jan
2
accepted Does this proof work?
Jan
2
comment Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Thank you that makes perfect sense.
Jan
2
comment Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Me defining D in Case 1 just makes it easy to prove that $A_1 \ cup B = $ natural numbers as $A_1 \ cup B $ says with words Exactly the same thing as the Set D
Jan
2
comment Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Very sorry Someone Edited my post and moved the Statement around to make no sense at all i put it back to what it originally said.
Jan
2
revised Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
added 19 characters in body
Jan
2
comment Prove Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$
Thats very clever I really like that approach thanks!
Jan
2
asked Prove that if a set A of natural numbers contains $n_0$ and whenever A contains k it also contains k+1.
Jan
2
accepted Prove Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$
Jan
2
comment Prove Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$
Very Clever i realized how to fix my proof w.o using the change you did on the inductive end. i really like the second proof w.o induction though thanks so much!
Jan
2
comment Prove Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$
Do you mean like a Taylor series expansion ( though i guess you would of set it up as 1+h = x-1 if that's what you wanted me to do.) or just the normal derivative?
Jan
2
asked Prove Bernoulli inequality if $h>-1$
Dec
29
comment Inequality proof trouble with the last step.
im sorry i don't follow you when min = $y_0$ /2 i don't understand how the proof works