meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | 3 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 15 |
|
May 14 |
comment |
difference of 2 partial computable algorithms i edited my question and write the main problem... |
|
May 14 |
comment |
difference of 2 partial computable algorithms is that ok? the main problem is this... |
|
May 14 |
revised |
difference of 2 partial computable algorithms added 109 characters in body |
|
May 14 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
May 14 |
comment |
difference of 2 partial computable algorithms i think this is not possible, but not similar your reason. your reason can omit by a simple paralleling this problem. |
|
May 14 |
asked | difference of 2 partial computable algorithms |
|
May 13 |
revised |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. added 123 characters in body |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. i'm sorry. now it is true. |
|
May 13 |
revised |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. deleted 111 characters in body |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. No. suppose we don't know that Halting problem is not recursive, and we want to prove that "Complement of halting problem is not r.e." and now we find that "Halting problem is not recursive." |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. Can you prove that complement of halting set is not r.e. ??? |
|
May 13 |
comment |
Complement of halting set is not r.e. :) i know that :) |
|
May 13 |
asked | Complement of halting set is not r.e. |
|
May 12 |
comment |
Where is wrong in this proof by omit this fact we can proof any of the number is equal to any of the other number |
|
May 12 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
May 12 |
accepted | Where is wrong in this proof |
|
May 12 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 12 |
revised |
Where is wrong in this proof added 6 characters in body |
|
May 12 |
awarded | Cleanup |
