| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 5 months |
| seen | Jun 5 '12 at 6:58 | |
| stats | profile views | 13 |
|
Feb 15 |
comment |
How to solve $n < 2^{n/8}$ for $n$? looks fine to me |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
How to solve $n < 2^{n/8}$ for $n$? ok, well that certainly explains why I was puzzling over this for a long time. I was trying to solve the wrong problem. Thanks |
|
Feb 6 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Feb 6 |
accepted | How to solve $n < 2^{n/8}$ for $n$? |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
How to solve $n < 2^{n/8}$ for $n$? That looks fine to me, and reminds me that I was trying to solve something outside the problem specification, namely the exact value of n where $2^n = n^8$. As a point of curiosity, can an exact number be calculated for that? |
|
Feb 6 |
asked | How to solve $n < 2^{n/8}$ for $n$? |
|
Dec 17 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 17 |
comment |
Proof of clockwise towers of Hanoi variant recursive solution Thanks, that seems to make sense to me. However one thing I remain unsure of is that this proof depends on the strategy of moving $R_k$ followed by 1 followed by $R_k$. While by "common sense" this makes sense, it isn't actually proved as the best strategy to move a stack $K_{n+1}$ or is it? |
|
Dec 17 |
accepted | Proof of clockwise towers of Hanoi variant recursive solution |
|
Dec 16 |
awarded | Student |
|
Dec 16 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Dec 16 |
revised |
Proof of clockwise towers of Hanoi variant recursive solution added 127 characters in body; edited title |
|
Dec 16 |
asked | Proof of clockwise towers of Hanoi variant recursive solution |