| bio | website | gpfreitas.net |
|---|---|---|
| location | United States | |
| age | 30 | |
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Dec 11 '12 at 23:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 22 |
Mathematical Economist by training (Caltech, IMPA, UnB) and hobbyist programmer with a strong interest in Optimization/Mathematical Programming and a range of applied problems.
|
Nov 6 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Oct 23 |
answered | Linear Algebra Textbook |
|
Oct 23 |
comment |
Show that a function that is locally increasing is increasing? Adding to coffeemath's point: remember the property (maybe definition, depends how you go about it) of compact sets in $\mathbb{R}$ that "every open covering has a finite subcovering". That should allow you to "globalize" the local statement. |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Comparison of nonlinear system solvers? Expand on the previous answer. |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Question regarding Kuhn-Tucker multiplier added 361 characters in body |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? Clarify where the supplied "proof" fails, based on the comments. |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Question regarding Kuhn-Tucker multiplier Cleanup. I cannot understand what is being asked in item (c). |
|
Oct 23 |
answered | Question regarding Kuhn-Tucker multiplier |
|
Oct 23 |
suggested | suggested edit on Question regarding Kuhn-Tucker multiplier |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? THERE WAS A MISTAKE IN THE PROOF. Giving proper credit in the main post. |
|
Oct 23 |
comment |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? Agreed. Bit by the "yeah... this should be obvious". My mistake was when I wrote "and more importantly, that $\lim z_{m} = 0$", because, for example the numbers $d(h(y_{m+p}), h(y_{m})$ may be constant (for all positive integers $p$). Counterexamples have already been mentioned (thanks, Asaf, Nate). More explicitly: in my setup, if $Y = (-1, 1)$, $X = \mathbb{R}$ and $h^{-1}(x) = \frac{x}{1+|x|}$, then setting $x_{n} = n$ and $y_{n} = h^{-1}(x_{n})$, we obtain $y_n$ that increases monotonically towards 1, and is thus Cauchy. But $x_{n}$ is not Cauchy, by construction. Thanks, guys. |
|
Oct 23 |
comment |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? Sorry, I didn't know about the 5min to comment rule. I'll reply shortly. |
|
Oct 23 |
comment |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? > Homeomorphism is not necessarily an isometry. |
|
Oct 23 |
awarded | Revival |
|
Oct 23 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 23 |
revised |
Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? Giving some intuition before the proof. |
|
Oct 23 |
answered | Why is it that $\mathbb{Q}$ cannot be homeomorphic to _any_ complete metric space? |
|
Oct 23 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Oct 23 |
answered | Are the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions applicable when one or more of the constraints are nonlinear? |
|
Oct 23 |
answered | Comparison of nonlinear system solvers? |