Jul
20
reviewed Approve suggested edit on $\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)}f(y)\, dy \right)= f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)$
Jul
20
comment Sum of normally distributed independent random variables, where one has a different (exponential) unit
the transformation is ugly. do not expect $Z$ to be standard
Jul
20
reviewed Reject suggested edit on What is a real number (also rational, decimal, integer, natural, cardinal, ordinal…)?
Jul
20
reviewed Approve suggested edit on Product-to-sum trigonometry identity
Jul
20
reviewed Approve suggested edit on How find the value of the $x+y$
Jul
20
reviewed Approve suggested edit on How do I notate that $1/2$ children do not exist
Jul
20
reviewed Close Check: Find the Fourier transform of $f(x)=ax+b$ with $a,b \in \Bbb R$.
Jul
20
comment Check: Find the Fourier transform of $f(x)=ax+b$ with $a,b \in \Bbb R$.
you doubt what is correct? Please write down what you have tried for this problem
Jul
20
reviewed Close Entire functions satisfying $|\mathrm{Re}\, f(z)| \geq c|\mathrm{Im} \,f(z)|$
Jul
20
reviewed Approve suggested edit on Convergence of a series using limit test
Jul
20
revised Law of large numbers for a Subordinator.
added 1 character in body; edited title
Jul
20
answered Law of large numbers for a Subordinator.
Jul
20
comment Quick question: formula for conditional variance
what you wrote here is basically a proof... i dont see how you cannot make it work...
Jul
20
comment Proof for Scheffe's Lemma and General Dominated Convergence theorem
yes ^ of course and nice proof. you should post an answer to that question :)
Jul
20
comment Proof for Scheffe's Lemma and General Dominated Convergence theorem
I think the answer to that is not quite correct. it was given as a condition that $\int f_n\rightarrow\int f$
Jul
20
comment Proof for Scheffe's Lemma and General Dominated Convergence theorem
I think your argument is fine but the way the OP in the other question wrote it is wrong. ( I have never seen this result you quoted before, but I just looked it up )
Jul
20
comment Proof for Scheffe's Lemma and General Dominated Convergence theorem
what is your question? do you mean the accepted answer to the question you linked?
Jul
20
revised Distribution of time spent above $0$ by a Brownian Bridge.
added 155 characters in body
Jul
20
revised Distribution of time spent above $0$ by a Brownian Bridge.
deleted 11 characters in body; edited title
Jul
20
revised Distribution of time spent above $0$ by a Brownian Bridge.
added 34 characters in body