| bio | website | genja.org |
|---|---|---|
| location | Ruthless Viking Territory 63°25'50.50 North | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Oct 21 '12 at 22:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
name.....: Jaroslav Rakhmatoullin avatar...: Robot Chicken © Seth Green interests: I LIEK TEH COMPUTARZ os.......: Gentoo Linux (GNU userland) languages: Java, PHP, Perl, JavaScript
|
Oct 17 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 15 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 15 |
comment |
How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? Simple and clever. I tried to get the same result, but forgot to exclude the odd multiples of 11. You gave me both a "confirmation" and a suggestion for improvement! I could not have hoped for a better answer. Thanks a million! |
|
Oct 15 |
accepted | How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? |
|
Oct 15 |
revised |
How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? corrected the original problem |
|
Oct 15 |
comment |
How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? The problem is actually to find out how many elements there are, and not to enumerate all the elements. |
|
Oct 15 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 15 |
revised |
How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? deleted 99 characters in body |
|
Oct 15 |
comment |
How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? @David Wallace The part I'm struggling with, is if I give an answer like that, then I have simply restated the problem in mathematical terms. Giving anything else as an answer, i.e. the whole set or parts of it, seems like an idiotic thing to do because there are 319 elements in it. So I'm thinking I have to explain what algorithm (function) I used to get the set and the formal definition of the set, like you wrote. |
|
Oct 15 |
asked | How can this algorithm be expressed in mathematical terms? |
|
Oct 15 |
awarded | Autobiographer |