1,471 reputation
21745
bio website
location Valdosta, ga
age 22
visits member for 2 years, 2 months
seen 2 days ago

I am just a man who has an insatiable desire for knowledge.

"For the rest, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is worthy of reverence and is honorable and seemly, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely and lovable, whatever is kind and winsome and gracious, if there is any virtue and excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think on and weigh and take account of these things [fix your minds on them]."~ Philippians 4:8


Feb
7
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
28
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
27
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
26
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
20
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
20
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
19
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
10
awarded  Benefactor
Jan
10
accepted Satisfiability Problem: Determining Which People To Invite
Jan
8
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
7
awarded  Popular Question
Jan
2
awarded  Promoter
Dec
28
comment Satisfiability Problem: Determining Which People To Invite
I don't believe that that is so. According to the answer key, which you seem to agree with, if Kanti attends the party, then Samir MUST attend--and there is no exception. But still, the answer key claims that p only if q is the same as q implies p, yet the people who answered my question given in the link state that p only if q is the same as p implies q. Essentially my question is, how can the answer key be correct, it would appear that it is incorrect.
Dec
28
asked Satisfiability Problem: Determining Which People To Invite
Dec
28
accepted Condition For A Set Having A Smallest Element
Dec
25
comment Conditional Statements: “only if”
This is a very interesting answer, something of which I was seeking.
Dec
24
accepted Conditional Statements: “only if”
Dec
24
comment Conditional Statements: “only if”
Okay, I believe I am beginning to understand now. Thank you.
Dec
24
comment Conditional Statements: “only if”
Why introduce the negations? Isn't that what you are doing, "arbitrarily" introducing negations? Why can't the statement be translated as is?
Dec
24
comment Conditional Statements: “only if”
So, the word "only" introduces a negation? Why is that so?