Reputation
309
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
Badges
2 12
Impact
~6k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 2 helpful flags
  • 36 votes cast
Mar
27
awarded  Notable Question
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Nov
24
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
24
awarded  Yearling
Aug
20
accepted What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum?
Aug
20
revised What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum?
deleted 73 characters in body
Aug
20
asked What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum?
Aug
20
accepted What is more compact equation of this relationship?
Jul
29
accepted What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation?
Jul
28
comment What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation?
Bra-Ket notation
Jul
28
revised What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation?
deleted 2 characters in body
Jul
28
asked What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation?
Mar
6
comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
ok thank you. so $\sinh^{-1}\tan x$ is The inverse Gudermannian function,
Mar
6
accepted what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Mar
6
revised what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
added 8 characters in body; edited title
Mar
6
comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
@Dominic Michaelis can solve it $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Mar
6
asked what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Feb
7
comment Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
@Peter Tamaroff maybe this point that in terms of the Gamma Function is only valid for integer values
Feb
7
revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
added 213 characters in body
Feb
7
revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
edited title