Neo
Reputation
305
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
 Mar27 awarded Notable Question Sep24 awarded Autobiographer Nov24 awarded Popular Question Sep24 awarded Yearling Aug20 accepted What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum? Aug20 revised What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum? deleted 73 characters in body Aug20 asked What is mathematical identity behind Charge continuum? Aug20 accepted What is more compact equation of this relationship? Jul29 accepted What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation? Jul28 comment What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation? Bra-Ket notation Jul28 revised What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation? deleted 2 characters in body Jul28 asked What is Lagrange's identity for Bra Ket notation? Mar6 comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ ok thank you. so $\sinh^{-1}\tan x$ is The inverse Gudermannian function, Mar6 accepted what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ Mar6 revised what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ added 8 characters in body; edited title Mar6 comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ @Dominic Michaelis can solve it $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ Mar6 asked what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$ Feb7 comment Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$? @Peter Tamaroff maybe this point that in terms of the Gamma Function is only valid for integer values Feb7 revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$? added 213 characters in body Feb7 revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$? edited title