Neo

less info
meta site favicon meta user | stack exchange network profile network profile
281 reputation
10
bio website
location The Matrix
age
visits member for 8 months
seen Mar 6 at 13:07
stats profile views 203

The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. That you are a slave, Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison for your mind.

Are We Living in a Simulated Universe?


135 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all
Mar
6
 comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
ok thank you. so $\sinh^{-1}\tan x$ is The inverse Gudermannian function,
Mar
6
 accepted what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Mar
6
 revised what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
added 8 characters in body; edited title
Mar
6
 comment what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
@Dominic Michaelis can solve it $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Mar
6
 asked what is simplify, of $\sin^{-1}\tanh\theta=?$
Feb
7
 comment Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
@Peter Tamaroff maybe this point that in terms of the Gamma Function is only valid for integer values
Feb
7
 revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
added 213 characters in body
Feb
7
 revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
edited title
Feb
7
 revised Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
added 36 characters in body; added 212 characters in body
Feb
7
 awarded  Custodian
Feb
7
 reviewed Approve suggested edit on Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
Feb
7
 asked Whether is my conclusion about euler gamma function correct? is it new conclusion $\Gamma (0)=i\pi$?
Feb
7
 revised $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
deleted 56 characters in body; edited title
Feb
7
 comment $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
@GEdgar ok thank you
Feb
7
 comment $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
@André Nicolas there is another problem without calculator i add to question as a point
Feb
7
 revised $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
added 281 characters in body
Feb
7
 comment $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
i try to delete my Question but i can't
Feb
7
 comment $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
@anon271828 there was a problem with my calculator variable set on x^0
Feb
7
 comment $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
@anon271828 The answer should be defined, but there is no answer for this one!
Feb
7
 asked $\Gamma [\frac {(m+1)}{(n-r+1)}]$ while it could be $\Gamma [(\frac {m+1}{n})-r+1]$which one is correct?
1 2 3 4 5 … 7