346 reputation
19
bio website atino.name
location Italy
age 26
visits member for 3 years, 5 months
seen Mar 18 at 12:51

I'm an Italian boy. Actually I'm studying Computer Science Engineering (Software Engineering) at the University of Catania.

Main interests

I really like programming. I am very experienced in Microsoft ASP.NET web applications development but also in other languages and application types:

  • Microsoft ASP.NET for web applications development (C#, VB.NET, F#)
  • Microsoft .NET Framework for software development (C#, VB.NET, F#)
  • Microsoft WCF and WPF applications
  • C++ with Boost library integration
  • C
  • Java (SE and EE) for applications development

I also like creating graphics, animations and presentation using the most popular applications ni the Adobe families (I saw Flash growing since when it was still a baby, 5.0, and it was still Macromedia).

Languages

I like travelling a lot, and the best part of travelling is experiencing new languages, new sounds new people and culture. I actually love Asia. I lived in Japan for one year and worked there. Made also a lot of friends and gonna return there soon (I hope).

Sports

I also like sports. I practiced many but now I almost focus on human swimming and open water human swimming.

Other

I laso like photography, food (strange food) and music.


Feb
29
comment How to deal with Ideals generation from a Poset of sets including the empty set?
OK, wait a moment Brian, sorry for disturbing again, but actually I cannot understand how you are building the lattice. Shouldn`t I consider all possible subsets in $S$?
Feb
29
comment How to deal with Ideals generation from a Poset of sets including the empty set?
Yes, thanks Patrick. Ah Patrick could you please tell me what you think about the two definitions I found of Ideal? In the linked question there is also a community wiki I started about this little debate of before, remember? What do you think about the two definitions?
Feb
29
revised How to deal with Ideals generation from a Poset of sets including the empty set?
added 624 characters in body
Feb
29
comment How to deal with Ideals generation from a Poset of sets including the empty set?
In the link to the question.... there you will find the definition. OK, I will write the definition also here... wait a min, sorry
Feb
29
asked How to deal with Ideals generation from a Poset of sets including the empty set?
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 26 characters in body
Feb
27
answered Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
Thankyou very much for your answer Brian, it helped me but azarel`s one was a little more explicit for the construction of the set using an inductive cardinal oriented approach.
Feb
27
accepted Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
I see, but it`s kinda strange. I admit that these books are quite old, some of them preceding 1990... maybe conventions about ideals changed in time... thanks Brian, I`ll investigate more about this.
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
OK think I got it... quite long procedure... Thanks a lot azarel, I will read better and try to understand it fully.
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 881 characters in body
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 674 characters in body
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
But to build the set of all ideals, what should I do? The relation is the following: $I \subseteq S$ is Ideal if $t \ in I, s \leq t \implies s \in I$. The condition $s \leq t$ is not $s \subseteq t$. So I should not take necessarly all subsets in $t$, but should look in $S$ for all those $s$ being $\leq t$ and include those in set $I$?
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 137 characters in body
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
@azarel: please see changes
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
Relations
Feb
27
comment Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
@Patrick: Yes... Patrick, I just copied the definition from the book because I was scared to write the definition in a wrong way, that`s just the reason why I used the mathematical notation and not the human notation. Never wanted to make it purposely difficult to understand. Thanks however for your kindness in your message.
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 432 characters in body
Feb
27
revised Getting a Distributive-Lattice from Poset or, equivalently, a Greedoid from a Poset
added 271 characters in body