meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 8 months |
| seen | May 14 at 7:01 | |
| stats | profile views | 69 |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Is $f(x) = x/x$ the same as $f(x) = 1$? Isn't it discontinuous because the limit as f(x) approaches 0 is not equal to f(0)? |
|
Oct 18 |
asked | Is $f(x) = x/x$ the same as $f(x) = 1$? |
|
Oct 7 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Oct 6 |
answered | Ratio proportion |
|
Oct 1 |
answered | Sleeping Mathematician (Sleeping Beauty) |
|
Sep 28 |
asked | Sleeping Beauty |
|
Sep 27 |
accepted | Is there an analytical solution to the following integral: |
|
Sep 27 |
asked | Is there an analytical solution to the following integral: |
|
Sep 18 |
accepted | Is this scenario possible and if so, find the equation of the hill |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
Direction of a bearing What did the teacher say? |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
Roots of fractions Please pick a best answer. |
|
Sep 18 |
comment |
Is this scenario possible and if so, find the equation of the hill Yes that does seem to answer what I was asking. Thanks! |
|
Sep 18 |
asked | Is this scenario possible and if so, find the equation of the hill |
|
Sep 18 |
accepted | Average Distance Between Random Points on a Line |
|
Sep 17 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Sep 17 |
comment |
Projectile Motion of a cannonball Ok, well I assumed that he would have had already been taught the formula before being given this question as homework. I don't think its necessary to derive a formula each time it is employed. Otherwise, it would defeat the whole point of formulas. |
|
Sep 17 |
comment |
Projectile Motion of a cannonball Can you please elaborate? How should I have explained this solution better and without using the formula? |
|
Sep 17 |
revised |
Direction of a bearing added 188 characters in body |
|
Sep 17 |
answered | Direction of a bearing |
|
Sep 15 |
comment |
Conditional Probability based on intersection of two sets, independent and dependent respectively Agreed. My above comment is a proof by Reductio ad absurdum that B is independent of C. |
