| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 17 | |
| visits | member for | 8 months |
| seen | 12 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 116 |
|
Dec 25 |
accepted | How is this second form of the Euler-Lagrange equation arrived at? |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
How is this second form of the Euler-Lagrange equation arrived at? By 'expand the total derivative of the function $F$' do you mean taking the differential: $\frac{dF}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(F_q dq+ F_{\dot{q}} d\dot{q}+ F_t dt)$? |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
How is this second form of the Euler-Lagrange equation arrived at? Wouldn't $\frac{d}{dt}(F-\dot{q}\frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot{q}})=0$ be the conservation of energy, or is $\frac{\partial F}{\partial t}=0$? |
|
Dec 24 |
asked | How is this second form of the Euler-Lagrange equation arrived at? |
|
Dec 24 |
accepted | Proving the equality of 2 functions |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
Proving the equality of 2 functions Thanks- I was going the wrong way, trying to force $h(n)$ out of $g(n,f(n-1))$. |
|
Dec 24 |
comment |
Proving the equality of 2 functions Yes, I condensed notation incorrectly. |
|
Dec 24 |
revised |
Proving the equality of 2 functions deleted 4 characters in body |
|
Dec 24 |
revised |
Proving the equality of 2 functions made more flowing |
|
Dec 24 |
asked | Proving the equality of 2 functions |
|
Dec 23 |
comment |
Invariants in a second order equation "Orthogonal transformations of $(x,y,z)$ (of which two-dimensional orthogonal transformations of only $x$ and $y$ are a special case) must, at a minimum, preserve the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of this matrix"- Why is this? (I know only rudimentary linear algebra, but the gist of the rest of the answer makes sense) |
|
Dec 23 |
revised |
Invariants in a second order equation added 3 characters in body |
|
Dec 23 |
revised |
Invariants in a second order equation edited tags |
|
Dec 23 |
asked | Invariants in a second order equation |
|
Dec 23 |
comment |
Spherical projection Both. I realise it would have been better to make two questions, the latter was more of an afterthought. Both answers helped; I somewhat arbitrarily chose Willie's on account of his links leading to further insights into spherical geometry, even though that wasn't part of the question. |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
Spherical projection Is the statement in the second quotation provable without using differential geometry? |
|
Dec 21 |
accepted | Spherical projection |
|
Dec 21 |
revised |
Spherical projection added 180 characters in body |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
Spherical projection Duly edited, thanks. |
|
Dec 20 |
accepted | What's the most elegant way of rotating a 3-dimensional co-ordinate system? |