Leonardo
Reputation
490
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
 Mar6 awarded Notable Question Jan23 awarded Popular Question Dec17 awarded Notable Question Sep3 awarded Popular Question Aug30 awarded Yearling Jul2 awarded Curious Feb26 awarded Popular Question Nov27 comment What, if anything, does it mean to be neither finite nor infinite for real numbers? @GitGud I greatly appreciate everyone that offers their knowledge to others. Nov27 accepted What, if anything, does it mean to be neither finite nor infinite for real numbers? Nov27 comment What, if anything, does it mean to be neither finite nor infinite for real numbers? @Did it would be like the same thing except factoring out a negative 1. Nov27 comment What, if anything, does it mean to be neither finite nor infinite for real numbers? Okay that is much more clear, thanks. Nov27 asked What, if anything, does it mean to be neither finite nor infinite for real numbers? Oct25 comment Problem based on Algebraic identities the $3ab^3$ term should be $3ab^2$ Oct25 comment Problem based on Algebraic identities Perhaps $x$ is an element of some mystical set we are unaware of, I propose $x$ is a duckgoose. Oct20 accepted Tallest bubble tower induction proof Oct20 comment Tallest bubble tower induction proof I think I see it, when I draw out what you say I can see the tower from $(Center)_1$ to $(Top)_n$ = $\sqrt{n}$. But then knowing that it is scaled by $r$ seems like a leap of faith, but it also seems right, somehow. I am not sure how you saw that connection, but great work. Oct20 comment Tallest bubble tower induction proof How do you get $r\sqrt{n}$ from the hypothesis? That is the part that I am really confused about. Oct20 revised Tallest bubble tower induction proof added 3 characters in body Oct20 comment Tallest bubble tower induction proof I know how the induction part works, the question is how do I use the inductive hypothesis to show the $n+1$ case = $1 + \sqrt{n+1}$? It is not obvious to me. Oct20 revised Tallest bubble tower induction proof maximum radii relationship proof