Stack Exchange
sign up
|
log in
|
chat
|
meta
|
about
|
faq
Mathematics
Questions
Tags
Tour
Users
Ask Question
Eruditass
less info
network profile
138
reputation
4
bio
website
location
age
visits
member for
2 years, 9 months
seen
May 16 at 3:08
stats
profile views
21
138
reputation
bio
website
visits
member for
2 years, 9 months
4
badges
location
seen
May 16 at 3:08
summary
answers
questions
tags
badges
favorites
bounties
reputation
activity
19
Actions
suggestions
reviews
revisions
comments
badges
posts
accepts
all
Oct
6
awarded
Scholar
Oct
6
accepted
How do you calculate conditional expectation for a single continuous r.v.?
Oct
6
comment
How do you calculate conditional expectation for a single continuous r.v.?
Thanks for the answer and explanation, makes sense to me.
Oct
6
awarded
Supporter
Oct
6
revised
How do you calculate conditional expectation for a single continuous r.v.?
added 41 characters in body; added 36 characters in body
Oct
6
asked
How do you calculate conditional expectation for a single continuous r.v.?
Oct
3
comment
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
What is the equation you are using to calculate it called? And which product sign are you referring to? m(m-1)/2 is the total # of pairs, but I don't see the dependent events factor of (correct me if its wrong) (52!)!/(52!-m)!
Oct
3
comment
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
Actually, wouldn't it be (52!)!/(52!-N)!
Oct
3
revised
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
added 51 characters in body; added 62 characters in body
Oct
3
comment
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
I figured that assumption was wrong somewhere and had forgotten about the birthday paradox. So I just need to multiply p2 by 52!/(52!-Np)?
Oct
3
comment
For all w, CDF of y at w is greater than the CDF of x at w. Prove that the probability ( y < x ) >= 0.5
It's for all w and yes we wanted P(y<x) > 0.5 but Fy(w) > Fx(w), so it should logically work itself out. Why is P(y < x) equal to the line under Fy(Fx) ? Why not Fy(fx)? And what do the functions mean without something feeding in like (w)?
Oct
3
revised
For all w, CDF of y at w is greater than the CDF of x at w. Prove that the probability ( y < x ) >= 0.5
added 68 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
Oct
3
comment
For all w, CDF of y at w is greater than the CDF of x at w. Prove that the probability ( y < x ) >= 0.5
Any distribution, and I believe they were independent if it matters.
Oct
3
awarded
Student
Oct
3
awarded
Editor
Oct
3
revised
For all w, CDF of y at w is greater than the CDF of x at w. Prove that the probability ( y < x ) >= 0.5
edited title
Oct
3
answered
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
Oct
3
asked
Probability of card decks being in the same order for N shufflers over X amount of time?
Oct
3
asked
For all w, CDF of y at w is greater than the CDF of x at w. Prove that the probability ( y < x ) >= 0.5
Mathematics Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled