| bio | website | math.bme.hu/~pintye |
|---|---|---|
| location | Budapest, Hungary | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Sperner's theorem on antichains - where does it come from? One of my professors, Gyula Katona, mentions in his doctoral thesis that Sperner used his result to answer the following question: given a square-free integer, what is the maximum number of its positive divisors that do not divide one another? I hope this might help. |
|
Dec 19 |
comment |
An equivalent condition for strong-mixing Ergodicity implies convergence in the Cesàro sense, thus, should it exist, the limit in (1) is $\mu(A)\mu(B)$. |
|
Dec 10 |
comment |
Winding number of algebraic curves You are right. The picture belongs to the real plane, but we need to work over an algebraically closed field. I have to think about this problem. |
|
Dec 10 |
comment |
Winding number of algebraic curves Obviously, this has something to do with parametrisation of algebraic curves, which is related to the resolution of singular points (for a picture, think about a node). Hopefully, the winding number might control the number of subsequent blow-ups in a certain desingularisation process, or at least give us a better insight to the nature of singular curves. |
|
Dec 10 |
asked | Winding number of algebraic curves |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Automorphisms of an affine line over finite fields @Andrew: I am still curious. Is it true that over a finite field any k-algebra automorphism of k[x]/I(A_k) is of the form [p(x)]->[p(ax+b)] as above? |
|
Dec 7 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Dec 7 |
accepted | Automorphisms of an affine line over finite fields |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Automorphisms of an affine line over finite fields Is there a classical theory for this without using the language of schemes, or it is just not interesting or perhaps difficult to deal with? |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Automorphisms of an affine line over finite fields I am not convinced. For any subvariety V of the affine line A_k, the coordinate ring k[V] is defined as the quotient k[x]/I(V). According to this, for V=A_k, we have k[A_k]=k[x]/I(A_k). Of course, when k is an infinite field, I(A_k)=(0), and the coordinate ring is just k[x]. In case of a finite field, we may have different polynomials with the same values on each element of k. |
|
Dec 7 |
asked | Automorphisms of an affine line over finite fields |
|
Sep 18 |
answered | Prove that if c is a common divisor of a and b then c divides the gcd of a and b.. |
|
Aug 19 |
comment |
Intuition on proof of Cauchy Schwarz inequality Because it is an invariant, explaining the very reason why you are trying to minimise $||y-kx||$. |
|
Aug 15 |
answered | Intuition on proof of Cauchy Schwarz inequality |
|
Aug 13 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Aug 13 |
answered | Tensor-free proof that for finite modules over reduced Noetherian rings, locally free = projective |
|
Aug 12 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 12 |
revised |
Construction of graded rings and modules added 2 characters in body |
|
Aug 12 |
revised |
Construction of graded rings and modules added 764 characters in body |
|
Aug 10 |
comment |
Construction of graded rings and modules By standard I mean standard (possibly multi-) graded polynomial algebras. I am also aware of Rees algebras, but they still rely heavily upon an ideal of a ring. I would be glad to hear about other approaches. |