ChuckM
Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
9
Impact
~2k people reached

• 0 posts edited
• 0 helpful flags
• 16 votes cast

# 64 Actions

 Dec15 awarded Caucus Sep24 awarded Autobiographer Jul2 awarded Curious Sep6 revised What does a partition function tells you? added 83 characters in body Sep6 asked What does a partition function tells you? Jun22 revised Methodology to Solve a Riccati Equation edited body Jun18 revised Methodology to Solve a Riccati Equation added 103 characters in body Jun18 asked Methodology to Solve a Riccati Equation Apr6 comment Spectral density function in stationary process ok thanks for the help Apr6 accepted Spectral density function in stationary process Apr6 comment Spectral density function in stationary process Yes your right, this is basically the point of this question is to prove both $c_j$ and $\gamma_j$ are finite but in my answer sheet I wish to understand why we must go through the spectral density. Thanks Apr6 asked Spectral density function in stationary process Mar31 comment Questions on Strong mixing coefficients that satisfy $\alpha(m) = O(m^{-a-\epsilon})$ @DavideGiraudo yes these tags are more appropriate. thanks Mar31 comment Questions on Strong mixing coefficients that satisfy $\alpha(m) = O(m^{-a-\epsilon})$ great! thanks! that's clear! I always have some kind of struggle with $Op(1)$ $op(1)$ and all that Mar31 accepted Questions on Strong mixing coefficients that satisfy $\alpha(m) = O(m^{-a-\epsilon})$ Mar31 asked Questions on Strong mixing coefficients that satisfy $\alpha(m) = O(m^{-a-\epsilon})$ Feb2 comment Question on Bayesian Learning and Probability Theory That's what I was expecting for the k+1.. because of the 0 possibility. In probability theory, can we say that's because of $\mu(\emptyset)=0$ ? My question ask to show that it is a martingale... at first I also thought of the same...because of the learning process.... Feb2 asked Question on Bayesian Learning and Probability Theory Jan13 comment Positive Definite Matrix Question thanks a lot. I never noticed that $eig(I-M)=eig(I)-eig(M)$ Jan13 accepted Positive Definite Matrix Question