# Zvpunry

less info
reputation
224
bio website location age 21 member for 1 year, 10 months seen Dec 11 '13 at 22:38 profile views 271

 Aug14 comment Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ @BiditAcharya why does $\lambda \notin S \Longrightarrow \mu \ne \sup S$ Aug14 revised Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ asked again Aug14 revised Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ asked again Aug14 comment Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ Ok I found my mistake there thank you @ArthurFischer Aug14 revised Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ fixed mistake in forward direction Aug14 asked Proving that $\mu$ is $\sup S$ Aug14 comment Appropriate Notation: $\equiv$ versus $:=$ @AnonymousCoward see here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/4216/how-to-typeset-correctly Aug14 revised Difference of two Cauchy Sequences edited body Aug13 revised Difference of two Cauchy Sequences added 16 characters in body Aug13 comment Difference of two Cauchy Sequences My mistake, I added the note that we are in $\mathbb R$ Aug13 revised Difference of two Cauchy Sequences added 16 characters in body Aug13 comment Are all infinities equal? I am interested by rigorizing "intuitive" statements such as "we can split these lines up and then 'add' them back together." For me, these are some of the hardest rigorous statements to make. How would you do it? Aug13 asked Difference of two Cauchy Sequences Aug13 awarded Nice Question Aug13 awarded Analytical Aug13 accepted Appropriate Notation: $\equiv$ versus $:=$ Aug13 comment Appropriate Notation: $\equiv$ versus $:=$ Thanks for weighing in Prof. @BrianM.Scott Aug13 revised Appropriate Notation: $\equiv$ versus $:=$ There were some format errors with the quotation marks, this is easier Aug13 asked Appropriate Notation: $\equiv$ versus $:=$ Aug13 awarded Commentator