Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
View close votes
Badges
1 12
Impact
~14k people reached

Feb
4
awarded  Popular Question
Oct
28
awarded  Popular Question
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Feb
11
awarded  Notable Question
Sep
24
awarded  Popular Question
Aug
29
awarded  Critic
Aug
29
comment Knight on a chessboard moving from a1 to h8
Please explain your solution in a language that can be most of us.
Aug
29
comment Knight on a chessboard moving from a1 to h8
@AndréNicolas Are you considering the squares excluding a1 or h8?
Aug
29
comment Knight on a chessboard moving from a1 to h8
I think that my argument could be wrong if we are considering all the squares and not just ones that will only visited. In fact, even if I consider 63 squares ( including h8 ), I am still having one white square in excess and hence the pairing won't be possible.
Aug
29
asked Knight on a chessboard moving from a1 to h8
Aug
4
accepted Difference between proof and plausible argument.
Apr
9
revised Question related to central limit theorem
added the homework tag and corrected a missing term in the summation.
Apr
9
suggested approved edit on Question related to central limit theorem
Apr
5
awarded  Organizer
Apr
5
revised question related to Bayes' rule and Bays' risk.
added tags and some text.
Apr
5
suggested approved edit on question related to Bayes' rule and Bays' risk.
Mar
27
accepted LOVES+LIVE=THERE. How many “loves” are “there”?
Mar
25
answered LOVES+LIVE=THERE. How many “loves” are “there”?
Mar
24
comment LOVES+LIVE=THERE. How many “loves” are “there”?
and hence I can also say that $S\neq0$. I am so sorry for this mistake.
Mar
24
asked LOVES+LIVE=THERE. How many “loves” are “there”?