Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
View close votes
Badges
5
Newest
 Tumbleweed
Impact
~313 people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 9 votes cast
Oct
25
comment Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function
Oh, I completely forgot about this question. No, the problem was that $f$ was not entire (that's why I only used Wirtinger differentials). I have managed to strengthen "$f$ is bounded" to "$f$ goes to zero on the infinity" since then, for which the proof is trivial. I should probably close the question now, as I'm not even sure this equality can be proved with my initial conditions.
Oct
24
awarded  Tumbleweed
Oct
17
awarded  Editor
Jul
29
awarded  Teacher
Jul
29
answered Can someone explain Gödel's incompleteness theorems in layman terms?
Apr
30
awarded  Supporter
Jun
6
asked Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function
Jun
2
comment Notation for application of the sequence of integrals
@tomasz: thanks, that's a viable variant.
Jun
2
comment Notation for application of the sequence of integrals
@MichaelHardy: that's why I picked the product sign as a temporary placeholder, until I find something better. Although it works better for differentials, because in that case $\partial x_1 \partial x_2$ is technically a product, while for integrals it is more of a successive application which is written similar to a product. I wish there was some sort of big "A" letter for this...
Jun
1
awarded  Student
Jun
1
asked Notation for application of the sequence of integrals