fjarri
Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
6
Impact
~363 people reached

• 0 posts edited

# 16 Actions

 Oct 16 accepted Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function Oct 16 answered Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function Oct 16 awarded Scholar Oct 16 accepted Notation for application of the sequence of integrals Oct 16 answered Notation for application of the sequence of integrals Oct 25 comment Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function Oh, I completely forgot about this question. No, the problem was that $f$ was not entire (that's why I only used Wirtinger differentials). I have managed to strengthen "$f$ is bounded" to "$f$ goes to zero on the infinity" since then, for which the proof is trivial. I should probably close the question now, as I'm not even sure this equality can be proved with my initial conditions. Oct 24 awarded Tumbleweed Oct 17 awarded Editor Jul 29 awarded Teacher Jul 29 answered Can someone explain Gödel's incompleteness theorems in layman terms? Apr 30 awarded Supporter Jun 6 asked Fourier transform of derivative for the bounded function Jun 2 comment Notation for application of the sequence of integrals @tomasz: thanks, that's a viable variant. Jun 2 comment Notation for application of the sequence of integrals @MichaelHardy: that's why I picked the product sign as a temporary placeholder, until I find something better. Although it works better for differentials, because in that case $\partial x_1 \partial x_2$ is technically a product, while for integrals it is more of a successive application which is written similar to a product. I wish there was some sort of big "A" letter for this... Jun 1 awarded Student Jun 1 asked Notation for application of the sequence of integrals