Josh Guffin
Reputation
394
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
Badges
2 10
Newest
Impact
~6k people reached

• 0 posts edited
• 0 helpful flags
• 36 votes cast

# 37 Actions

 Mar14 awarded Nice Question Jul9 awarded Notable Question Sep2 awarded Self-Learner Jan6 awarded Popular Question Nov1 awarded Yearling May17 comment What is the name of the quadrilateral shape described by two radii and two arcs? It's a trapezoid in polar coordinates :) Mar6 accepted What is the name of the function $f(k) = \text{max}(k,0)$ on $\mathbb Z$? Mar6 asked What is the name of the function $f(k) = \text{max}(k,0)$ on $\mathbb Z$? Feb26 accepted Traditional axes in 3d Mathematica plots? Jan6 answered Traditional axes in 3d Mathematica plots? Jan5 comment Traditional axes in 3d Mathematica plots? In general no, but I would like them to be drawn by the system rather than adding them in by hand (with Graphics[] directives); I don't want to have to specify the length of the arrows every time. Jan5 awarded Commentator Jan5 comment Traditional axes in 3d Mathematica plots? That's 50% of what I'm looking for - do you know if it's possible to cut off the negative bits, so that the axes are rays instead of lines? Jan5 asked Traditional axes in 3d Mathematica plots? Dec2 comment Re-arranging a complex equation As was pointed out in your other question, "make d the subject" will be more understood if you say "solve for d" Dec2 comment Re-arranging a complex equation Try reading the FAQ before posting (always a good idea in any online community): meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/107/… Dec2 answered Cohomological decomposition of tensor sheaves? Nov26 comment Which geometric distribution to use? Geometric always means "the number of trials before the state changes", i.e. from success to failure or vise-versa, and you have to interpret it according to what is being described. Given the simplicity of the distribution, the one to which an author is referring is almost always obvious after a second of thought. Nov15 awarded Autobiographer Nov13 comment Does having a codimension-1 embedding of a closed manifold $M^n \subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ require $M$ to be orientable? Is your question about $M^n$ or about $\mathbb {RP}^n$? If the former, the Möbius band embedded into $\mathbb R^3$ says the answer is no.