177 reputation
7
bio website
location
age 36
visits member for 2 years, 8 months
seen Dec 11 at 23:33

Late learner.


Dec
11
awarded  Autobiographer
Dec
11
asked The local rings of $xy=0$ and $xy+x^3+y^3=0$ are not isomorphic, but have isomorphic completions?
Dec
11
accepted Conditions to ensure the chain homotopy category $K(\mathcal{A})$ is abelian?
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Apr
22
comment Conditions to ensure the chain homotopy category $K(\mathcal{A})$ is abelian?
@ZhenLin I guess I'm mostly curious if there are cases where it is in fact abelian.
Apr
22
asked Conditions to ensure the chain homotopy category $K(\mathcal{A})$ is abelian?
Nov
17
comment If $T$ has an adjoint, why is $T(X\times Y)\simeq T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Thanks Stefan. What is $\eta_B$?
Nov
17
asked If $T$ has an adjoint, why is $T(X\times Y)\simeq T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Nov
17
accepted What is meant by a natural morphism $T(X\times Y)\to T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Nov
17
comment What is meant by a natural morphism $T(X\times Y)\to T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Thank you Smoore.
Nov
17
comment What is meant by a natural morphism $T(X\times Y)\to T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Thank you @Martin.
Nov
17
asked What is meant by a natural morphism $T(X\times Y)\to T(X)\times T(Y)$?
Nov
17
comment Confusion in Burnside's proof that any $2$-generated group of exponent $3$ is finite?
The proof is from Burnside's 1902 paper "On an unanswered question on discontinuous groups."
Nov
17
accepted Confusion in Burnside's proof that any $2$-generated group of exponent $3$ is finite?
Nov
9
comment Confusion in Burnside's proof that any $2$-generated group of exponent $3$ is finite?
I'm aware that it's not necessary, but I'd still like to understand the details out of curiosity.
Nov
9
asked Confusion in Burnside's proof that any $2$-generated group of exponent $3$ is finite?
Feb
5
comment On the equivalence relation in a right Ore domain.
Dear rschwieb sorry for my delay! I hadn't logged in for months. Thank you for writing that out.
Feb
5
accepted On the equivalence relation in a right Ore domain.
Jul
2
revised Why is multiplication well defined in this ring with the Ore condition?
added 13 characters in body
Jul
2
revised Why is multiplication well defined in this ring with the Ore condition?
added 457 characters in body