22,614 reputation
32157
bio website math.stackexchange.com/users/…
location
age 30
visits member for 1 year, 2 months
seen 30 mins ago
stats profile views 1,837

PhD in rings and modules

Interests:

Mathematical: ring and module theory, geometry, Lie algebra, Clifford algebra, mathematical physics

Other: programming, Wikipedia, chess


23m
comment Looking for a good counterargument against vector space decomposition.
If using the topological argument, does the proof hinge only on the field being ordered and using the product topology of the order topology in $F^n$?
26m
revised Looking for a good counterargument against vector space decomposition.
added 130 characters in body
31m
comment Looking for a good counterargument against vector space decomposition.
That's interesting: so the picture is that if the segment between $u_{k+1}$ and $w_k$ hits a $V_j$ twice, then the entire segment lies in $V_j$, but the endpoints surely don't. It seems to be based on convexity. I can't tell if the solution I have uses the same mechanism or not. When I came up with it, it was result of thinking "how do I get a contradiction?" This one, on the other hand, sounds like it came from a picture :)
43m
revised Looking for a good counterargument against vector space decomposition.
added 381 characters in body
49m
answered Looking for a good counterargument against vector space decomposition.
14h
comment Isomorphism quaternions and matrix
As you can see, I had a hard time trying to figure out what you meant, and I imagine they did too. I can't figure out how your question is different from the linked question (which I suggested as a duplicate). Don't worry, if you can edit the question to clarify the question enough, I can vote to reopen it! The question is not necessarily gone forever :)
16h
comment Isomorphism quaternions and matrix
When what is equal to zero? You mean, there exists an $x\neq0$ such that $x\overline{x}=0$? I'm just guessing here...
16h
comment Geometric Series help!
What have you tried? (On any of them?)
16h
comment Isomorphism quaternions and matrix
OK, that's what I thought: $x\overline{x}$ where $x=x_0+x_1i+x_2j+x_3k$ and $\overline{x}=x_0-x_1i-x_2j-x_3k$. But my question is what do you mean "=0"? It doesn't seem likely that you mean the norm is identically zero.
16h
comment Isomorphism quaternions and matrix
Part of the problem here may be that it's hard to understand what you're asking. What does "if norm of quaternions =0" mean? What norm are you thinking of?
16h
reviewed Approve suggested edit on The dimension of the vector space of all trace-zero symmetric matrices
16h
reviewed No Action Needed Contour integration with branch cut
16h
reviewed Close Project Euler problem 432
16h
reviewed Close List of explicit enumerations of rational numbers
16h
reviewed Close x^3 - 5x an old question I can't find
16h
reviewed Leave Open Very simple question about solving linear systems numerically by using LU decomposition
16h
reviewed No Action Needed Can we recover the following from, for example, the uniform boundedness principle
16h
reviewed No Action Needed Which function gets larger?
16h
reviewed No Action Needed Utilization difference between a multiple server, single queue and a multiple server, multiple queue system
16h
reviewed Reviewed Learning to read complex math formulas