| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | Jun 11 at 20:32 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
Apr 17 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr 17 |
accepted | Possible ways to numerically solve this equation |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation I'll study the method to understand it better but I tested with several values and it works, so I'm accepting your answer. |
|
Apr 17 |
revised |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation added 68 characters in body |
|
Apr 17 |
revised |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation added 61 characters in body |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation Yes, a,b, c are non-zero positive integers. |
|
Apr 17 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation Ok, thanks, I updated the question to reflect that. |
|
Apr 17 |
revised |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation added 182 characters in body |
|
Apr 17 |
awarded | Student |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation To be fair, my question does ask specifically for a numerical method to solve this, as I realize it can't be solved analytically. |
|
Apr 17 |
comment |
Possible ways to numerically solve this equation Well, WA did solve it though. See eq3 where I have all terms but y. It resulted in "Numerical Solution: y $\approx$ 1.10150000054474..." |
|
Apr 17 |
asked | Possible ways to numerically solve this equation |