meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Jan 21 at 12:17 | |
| stats | profile views | 103 |
|
Jun 17 |
accepted | Automorphisms in unit disk |
|
Jun 17 |
accepted | A question Riemann's mapping theorem |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
A question Riemann's mapping theorem Ahh, the bijective property does not uphold, I see. |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | A question Riemann's mapping theorem |
|
Jun 17 |
accepted | Analytic functions with poles |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Analytic functions with poles You are absolutely right, $f(z)-a$ has no zeroes (this is part of the proof of Picards theorem for meromorphic functions). |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Analytic functions with poles Sorry, my questions was very badly phrased. I've edited. Thank you for your input and sorry again! |
|
Jun 17 |
revised |
Analytic functions with poles added 20 characters in body |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Harmonic Function which cannot be described as real part of a holomorphic function The fact that $\log|z|$ is not defined at zero is the reason why it is not the real part of a holomorphic function on the same region? |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Analytic functions with poles |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Antiderivative simply connected region Yes, you are right. |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Automorphisms in unit disk So, the Blaschke factor is just a particular case for $\theta=0$ and all other possible automorphisms of $\mathbb{D}$ are constructed by multiplying the Blaschke factor with some $e^{i\theta}$ and these are the only ones? |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Automorphisms in unit disk |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Harmonic Function which cannot be described as real part of a holomorphic function |
|
Jun 17 |
comment |
Antiderivative simply connected region $f$ is analytic on a set $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{C}$, if it is complex differentiable in every point in $\Omega$. |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Descriptive explanation of the term “homotopic” |
|
Jun 17 |
asked | Antiderivative simply connected region |
|
Jun 16 |
comment |
Maximum principle I still don't get (2), see the edited post. |
|
Jun 16 |
revised |
Maximum principle added 284 characters in body |
|
Jun 7 |
comment |
How to determine the type of singularities Is the approach correct? Even if the limits where not evaluated correctly. |
