| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Mar 9 at 2:46 | |
| stats | profile views | 9 |
|
May 7 |
answered | Is there a standard way to compute $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}(\frac{n!}{n^n})^{1/n}$? |
|
Apr 18 |
comment |
Non-disjoint partition of a graph into cliques of bounded size Reading the context you added - if you just want to make sure the graph is connected, computing the connected components of a graph is quite easy. From there it is a simple matter of adding edges between the components. I'm not sure how the "sets" you've described work (where do new edges go?), but there are a number of metrics which are easy to compute which may assist you in determining edges to add. Edge-connectivity, min-cuts, diameter of a graph, and max distance from a vertex to any other vertex are all useful and can be ways to measure "connectivity". |
|
Apr 17 |
answered | Finding a point above the line in $O(\log n)$ |
|
Apr 16 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 15 |
comment |
Non-disjoint partition of a graph into cliques of bounded size Degree-based clique growing could be an interesting attempt. Start by computing the degree of each node (note that each node has a set of neighbors [edges]). Start with your highest degree node. Pick the neighbor with highest degree and intersect the neighbor sets [denote this set $S$]. Pick the node $n$ from $S$ with highest degree and intersect the neighbors of $n$ with $S$ and rename that $S$. Repeat. Once $S$ is empty, pick a new node by taking the highest degree node that is not yet in a clique and repeat. This has lots of flaws, but it's hard to optimize without a precise goal. |
|
Apr 15 |
answered | Non-disjoint partition of a graph into cliques of bounded size |
|
Apr 15 |
answered | How important is programming for mathematicians? |
|
Apr 15 |
answered | Help in Independence of events |
|
Apr 13 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Apr 13 |
answered | Probability axiomatic definition problem |
|
Apr 12 |
awarded | Analytical |