249 reputation
19
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 5 months
seen Jun 20 at 10:52

Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Mar
25
asked How to find a resultant vector for given multiple vectors lie on different position.
Mar
16
accepted Fragemented linear feature alignment technique
Mar
1
awarded  Popular Question
Feb
28
asked Difference between polyhedral, CSG and B-rep
Dec
26
asked The exact type of my 3d model
Dec
22
revised Geometric accuracy analysis of 2d rectangular models
deleted 104 characters in body
Dec
22
revised Geometric accuracy analysis of 2d rectangular models
edited tags
Dec
22
asked Geometric accuracy analysis of 2d rectangular models
Sep
20
revised sweeping edges till they get a given elevation on an oblique plane
added 105 characters in body
Sep
20
revised sweeping edges till they get a given elevation on an oblique plane
added 95 characters in body
Sep
20
asked sweeping edges till they get a given elevation on an oblique plane
Sep
16
comment Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
but, due to the incorrect ridge lines i can not get it as it is. as my main idea i to apply different regularity rules, in the end product azimuth, angles should have regular values. so to do this, i think i should fix this rotational errors of planes. as the whole process is automated one, i cant rely many things as i am implementing this in c++. if this is not clear, shall i post a new post
Sep
16
comment Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
sorry for confusing you. to be honest, i am having some other types of objects like prism having a horizontal ridge with inclind ridges. for these objects, i am trying touse some other mechanism. first i want to adjust the horizontality of that ridge, then inclind rdiges. but by setting the horizontality and then let in to pass the inclined plane through the end of that ridge does not change the azimuth differences. if i get a 2d scene, then the ridges given by inlclined plane will lead to a traingle whose base angle are equal.
Sep
16
comment Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
any possibility to rotate a plane till its azimuth reach 90 degree difference with the adjacent one while preserving its "d" in the same value?
Sep
16
comment Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
yes, I got your explanation and thank you very much for that. But, to find the average apex, first i should have the intersected lines. But, first, i want to adjust the planes in a way to get their XY projected normal vector in a more regualr mannar (i.e. 90 degree difference). for that, i can find a starting plane by finding the plane having many points or smallest rmse. if you dont mind, would it be possible to explain a way to update these planes. (accordig to my undestanding for the suggest way, i need to know the lines, but practically i am not computing them till they adjust)
Sep
16
revised Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
deleted 146 characters in body
Sep
16
revised Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
deleted 2 characters in body
Sep
16
asked Correcting plane parameters with the fixed azimuth angles
Jul
12
comment Obtaining Least square adjusted single line by intersecting many 3D planes
to be honest, the implementation of second part is still confusing me. What should I actually tested? what do you mean by last sentence. please be kind enough to simplify this problem again. thank you