| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | India | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | May 18 at 9:47 | |
| stats | profile views | 70 |
|
May 18 |
comment |
Power series of $f(x)=\sqrt{\frac{1+x}{1-x}}$ Of course $ |x|< 1$ for this to hold, that would be radius of convergence of the series, I think. |
|
May 18 |
answered | Power series of $f(x)=\sqrt{\frac{1+x}{1-x}}$ |
|
May 17 |
accepted | Closed sets in a given topology |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Closed sets in a given topology Thanks a lot, I guess I should have just picked up on a specific point to work on than wandering around arbitrarily. |
|
May 17 |
asked | Closed sets in a given topology |
|
May 17 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Mar 28 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Mar 26 |
answered | Do you have any idea what matrix space is? |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Closure of a compact set in Regular space $ X $ Thanks for the answer, the last statement however, I couldn't comprehend. |
|
Mar 25 |
accepted | Closure of a compact set in Regular space $ X $ |
|
Mar 25 |
asked | Closure of a compact set in Regular space $ X $ |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
General definition of a line Ok, I guess I need to read along a bit more to get a better picture. Thanks a lot for your patience. |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
General definition of a line I am sorry if I am sounding a bit dumb, but what I was trying to understand is this. The need for a Non-Euclidean Geometry was borne out of problems with Euclid's parallel postulate, which here is however proved as a theorem. I wanted to know what is the subtle problem in the definition of a line and parallelism here that still gives scope for the existence of such a geometry. Here line and notion of parallelism are the axiomatic concepts, so there should be something lacking there?? |
|
Nov 18 |
comment |
General definition of a line So the "t" in the definition can be from some other field than $R$?? I don't know how much sense that makes as $R$ has some special properties. Also, is this geometrical setup complete? I mean as the definition involves an arbitrary vector space, how does one arrive at a Non-Euclidean Geometry? |
|
Nov 18 |
asked | General definition of a line |
|
Nov 11 |
comment |
Difference between two alternative definitions of a differentiable manifold. That's what i thought too, apart from the fact that it allows new entrants to visualise the construction of 2-D surfaces better. Thanks a lot anyways, I'll just a wait a little longer to see if anyone comes up with anything else. |
|
Nov 11 |
asked | Difference between two alternative definitions of a differentiable manifold. |
|
Nov 4 |
awarded | Tumbleweed |
|
Oct 30 |
comment |
Explanation about frames as distinct from a co-ordinate system Thanks, that is as close to an answer I was hoping for. Can you add anything about Frenet frame or moving frame though, as to how exactly they fit in into the scheme of things? |
|
Oct 30 |
asked | Explanation about frames as distinct from a co-ordinate system |