meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 7 months |
| seen | Apr 26 at 14:13 | |
| stats | profile views | 95 |
Just me!
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Wedderburn-Artin theorem Patrick: Thanks. I have some good level in mathematics and I have never heard this second part which I mentioned. The cyclic part is of course OK. But thanks in clarify me the second one! |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Wedderburn-Artin theorem The module $B$ is a typo, right? You mean $A$ I guess. |
|
Nov 20 |
asked | Wedderburn-Artin theorem |
|
Nov 13 |
asked | Applications of the Jordan-Hölder Theorem. |
|
May 2 |
revised |
homomorphism of Laurent polynomial ring Just to name an equation |
|
May 2 |
suggested | suggested edit on homomorphism of Laurent polynomial ring |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Surjective homomorphism on Laurent polynomial ring, part II Hi, could you give a look at my other question in link. Thanks, |
|
Apr 19 |
asked | homomorphism of Laurent polynomial ring |
|
Jan 22 |
comment |
PBW Theorem applied to graded Lie algebras @user8268 The gradation is in $\mathbb Z_+^n$, then something more is necessary. There is no meaning for $b_1<\cdots< b_m$ in this case. Do you know where there exists a proof in the case of $\mathbb Z_+$-gradation? I think that it is possible to extend it... Otherwise, you could write one here to help! |
|
Jan 22 |
comment |
PBW Theorem applied to graded Lie algebras @user8268: I think that he wants a decomposition of each piece in terms of tensor products of symmetric powers of ${\frak a}[r_i]$ for suitable choice of $a[r_i]$. I don't know how to do either. |
|
Jan 5 |
awarded | Promoter |
|
Jan 1 |
asked | Integral forms of loop algebras. |
|
Dec 25 |
accepted | Sum involving units of a ring. |
|
Dec 24 |
accepted | Parabolic subalgebra |
|
Dec 16 |
accepted | Surjective homomorphism on Laurent polynomial ring, part II |
|
Dec 16 |
comment |
Surjective homomorphism in Laurent polynomial ring. Thank you for helping me to do in the better way! I was not realizing the importance of this hypothesis which was inserted in the new question link. It was very helpful to understand what happens if I take out this hypothesis on my original problem. See the other question if you can! |
|
Dec 16 |
asked | Surjective homomorphism on Laurent polynomial ring, part II |
|
Dec 16 |
awarded | Cleanup |
|
Dec 16 |
accepted | Surjective homomorphism in Laurent polynomial ring. |
|
Dec 16 |
revised |
Surjective homomorphism in Laurent polynomial ring. rolled back to a previous revision |
