Reputation
448
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
Badges
1 3 12
Impact
~22k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 77 votes cast
Jun
13
awarded  Popular Question
Jun
1
awarded  Famous Question
May
15
awarded  Popular Question
Apr
8
comment Conceptual question on Probability
Yes, I know there's some kind of psychology in this question. @krirkrirk pointed an interesting fact, I haven't minded that there are more 'sparse' subsets than 'contiguous' ones. It's know that most people aren't aware of this, but maybe by intuition, they believe it, which turns out to be true.
Apr
8
asked Conceptual question on Probability
Oct
30
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
22
comment Doubt on Fundamental Limit reduction
Got it, thank you.
Sep
22
comment Doubt on Fundamental Limit reduction
Then we have $\lim_x{\sin{y}}{x}$, but this squeeze theorem isn't only true when the sine argument is equals to function denominator ?
Sep
22
comment Doubt on Fundamental Limit reduction
This rule only states for what you shown with \alpha, the sine argument must be equals to it's denominator ? And how about when we can't separate the denominator in a multiplication which does not affect the result ? like sin(4x)/sin(3x).
Sep
22
asked Doubt on Fundamental Limit reduction
Sep
10
comment Limit factoring
noticed it. Thank you.
Sep
10
accepted Limit factoring
Sep
10
comment Limit factoring
As x -> 7, 3(7 - x) = 0.
Sep
10
comment Limit factoring
With this multiplication, the upper side will become 0.
Sep
10
comment Limit factoring
yes @amWhy, I had another typo, sorry.
Sep
10
revised Limit factoring
edited body
Sep
10
comment Limit factoring
sorry, I had a typo, fixed now.
Sep
10
asked Limit factoring
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Jun
26
awarded  Yearling