# prpl.mnky.dshwshr

less info
reputation
617
bio website location age member for 2 years, 8 months seen Nov 16 at 14:39 profile views 710

?- love(math) is unrequited. true.

# 254 Actions

 Apr8 revised How to study math to really understand it and have a healthy lifestyle with free time? added 2434 characters in body Apr8 answered How to study math to really understand it and have a healthy lifestyle with free time? Apr8 answered Math Database For Problem Descriptions In An App. Apr6 comment Finding a force function from bodies in equilibrium For the numerical approximation part, this sounds like a problem that will benefit from simulated annealing. Apr6 comment What matrices preserve the $L_1$ norm for positive, unit norm vectors? Another way to put it is that the columns of $P$ are discrete distributions. Multiplying such a matrix by another distribution will yield a mixture of the columns, where the mixture weights sum to 1, hence that mixture must also be a discrete distribution. Apr5 answered Probability of absorption in a discrete Markov chain Apr5 comment Find the Bayes estimate of $θ$ That's almost correct, but what would happen if $\theta$ was smaller than 5? Could you ever draw a 5 from such a uniform distribution? Also, instead of just looking for the "peak" as I wrote, it sounds like you need the mean squared error. First work on getting to the point where you are confidence that you understand $p(\theta|5)$ then we can use the definition of mean squared error to finish off the problem. Apr5 comment Find the Bayes estimate of $θ$ What have you tried? Here is a hint: what is the probability $P(5|\theta)$ since you know that the probability of an observation is uniform between $0$ and $\theta$? Once you know this, then you can write down $P(\theta | 5)$ using Bayes' rule and find where it has a peak. Apr4 revised What is a “vanishing moment”? added 259 characters in body Apr4 answered What is a “vanishing moment”? Apr3 comment Using Homotopy to solve system of nonlinear equations Just as an aside, there's a whole theory of convex optimization to consider. You can use interior point methods, semi-Newton methods, gradient methods, or even basic line search methods to find roots. I'm not suggesting that your interest in homotopy methods is bad, but you'll probably be much better served by considering the half-century old ideas on root-finding with linear algebra before going off to homotopy. Apr3 revised Searching for numerical algorithm realization added 589 characters in body Apr3 revised Searching for numerical algorithm realization added 589 characters in body Apr3 revised Searching for numerical algorithm realization added 589 characters in body Apr3 revised Searching for numerical algorithm realization added 589 characters in body Apr3 comment Show/Prove two conditions when $P$ is an $n \times n$ matrix such that $P^2 = P$ and $P^t = P$. Hint for the hint: What is $P(x-Px)$? Apr2 answered Searching for numerical algorithm realization Apr2 comment Making bounded an unbounded integral Alternatively, it might be possible to pick any strictly-increasing, concave function $g(x)$ that is integrable w.r.t. $p(x)$, and then compose it with $F^{-1}(x)$ to get $f(x) = g(F^{-1}(F(x))) = g(x)$. I'm not sure under what conditions $g(F^{-1}(y))$ will also be strictly-increasing and concave though. Apr2 comment How can we bound $P\{X \ge t\}$ from below? @J.D. Chebyshev's inequality is still an upper bound on probability (for a non-negative variable). It is where Markov's inequality is derived from, so it's likely that the poster already knew of this bound regardless. I suppose one can expand the absolute value usually used in it into two events, then use complements and multiply by -1 to get a statement of lower bounded probability, but it won't be in terms of a useful bound as it will always involve the other probability of the other "half-event" that you split out of the absolute value. Mar30 comment How can I calculate the CDF of this random variable? When I do the computation by hand, I am able to easily perform the integral over the variable $x_{2}$, and then the resulting integral over $x_{3}$ is of the form $\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\alpha}{\epsilon + \beta x_{3}}\cdot{}\exp{(\frac{-x_{3}}{\Omega_{3}})}$, for constants $\alpha$, $\epsilon$, and $\beta$. According to Wolfram integrator, an integral of this type requires the Exponential Integral function Ei() to express the solution.