zero-divisor
Reputation
375
Top tag
Next privilege 500 Rep.
Access review queues
 Dec22 awarded Caucus Sep24 awarded Autobiographer Jun15 awarded Nice Question Jun12 awarded Critic Jun12 comment Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? Note that . I don't require the strategy to have a positive expectation, only a non-negative one. Jun9 awarded Quorum Jun9 comment Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? I'm sorry but If you are sure about your statement, you should be able to at least sketch some kind formal proof. If you make statements without proving them, I cannot accept your post as an answer. This is a game theoretical question which should not be answered by referring to (unproven) "common sense". Jun9 revised Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? added 6 characters in body Jun9 comment Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? I'm not sure with the second collusion example either. Could you elaborate on why exactly our EV becomes negative there? Jun9 revised What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? added 28 characters in body Jun9 revised What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? added 165 characters in body Jun9 revised What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? added 55 characters in body Jun9 revised What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? added 469 characters in body Jun9 comment What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? @Muprid: Good point. I've deleted the sentence now. Jun9 revised What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? deleted 5 characters in body Jun9 comment What is the use of the Dot Product of two vectors? @Muphrid: Of course you can define something like an "angle" in arbitrary dimensions. I've changed "geometrical" to "visual", I think that makes more sense. Jun8 comment Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? I'm not sure whether collusion matters here. In your example for instance, we're effectively playing against one other player with a very strong range, but who also pays $(n-1)$-times the blinds we do, so it's at least non-trivial that this constellation gives us a negative EV, isn't it? Jun8 revised Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? added 178 characters in body Jun8 awarded Commentator Jun8 comment Game Theory: Is there an “unexploitable” strategy in No Limit Holdem? But not winning more than my share does not mean I have negative EV, does it?