| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | Dec 5 '12 at 15:20 | |
| stats | profile views | 27 |
|
May 6 |
comment |
gradient descent rule well, for instance, in perceptron, you have w*x as your output. as you differentiate with respect to w_i you get set of Linear Equations. I guess maybe you meant full NN with hidden layers? |
|
May 6 |
revised |
gradient descent rule added 1 characters in body; edited title |
|
May 6 |
comment |
gradient descent rule my bad... spelling was not an issue, but funny comment indeed :) |
|
May 6 |
asked | gradient descent rule |
|
May 5 |
accepted | regression vs classification |
|
May 5 |
asked | regression vs classification |
|
May 4 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
May 4 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
May 4 |
accepted | Concavity proof help |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help got it ! thanks a lot :) |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help OK, what about the Right hand side? the right hand side has ax^2, not a^2x^2 |
|
May 4 |
revised |
Concavity proof help added 93 characters in body |
|
May 4 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help I modified my question to include my desired formula |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help I know, would you attempt solving it using the frmula in my comment? |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help Well, I meant if anyone could show it using the formula in my comment I would really appreciate it.... |
|
May 4 |
revised |
Concavity proof help added 1 characters in body; edited title |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Concavity proof help Sorry, I meant concave... It does not seem to work. I know that f(ax + (1-a)y) >= af(x) + (1-a)f(y) |
|
May 4 |
asked | Concavity proof help |
|
Apr 23 |
awarded | Student |