Reputation
1,979
Top tag
Next privilege 2,000 Rep.
Edit questions and answers
Badges
1 9 22
Impact
~33k people reached

6h
asked Non-standard numbers and exponential form of Zeta function
2d
revised definite integral of $x^2e^{-x^2}$
this is not related to Euler's constant
2d
suggested approved edit on definite integral of $x^2e^{-x^2}$
Aug
23
revised Conventions adopted for extended reals
deleted 1 character in body
Aug
23
comment What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
"would seem to contradict the definition" - it would not if $\varepsilon^2=0$ as in dual/parabolic numbers. The given definition as I figured out leads exactly to the dual numbers system.
Aug
23
comment What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
Thank you for pointing out Euler's work. It seems this definition leads exactly to the system of dual numbers: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_number In dual numbers we have exactly $\exp(\varepsilon)=1+\varepsilon$ although the first form of the definition does not work because division by $\varepsilon$ is undefined.
Aug
23
comment What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
@Hurkyl well I think this question can be closed because in dual numbers en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_number we have exactly that: $\exp(\varepsilon)=1+\varepsilon$
Aug
23
comment What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
@Hurkyl what if to consider $\varepsilon$ not just an infinitesimal but as just some new algebraic element with this property?
Aug
23
comment Conventions adopted for extended reals
@mercio no, we get 6=5.
Aug
23
comment Conventions adopted for extended reals
@mercio wrong. if we define 0/0=0, and devide the both parts of $0\cdot 17=0$ by 0, we get 0=0, no contradiction.
Aug
23
comment Conventions adopted for extended reals
@mercio what contradictions appear if we define $0/0=0$?
Aug
23
comment What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
@Hurkyl literally equal.
Aug
23
revised Conventions adopted for extended reals
deleted 24 characters in body
Aug
23
asked What happens if to introduce infinite and infinitesimel quantities this way?
Aug
23
comment Is there a name for complex numbers over affinely extended reals?
@Hurkyl agreed, but what's the usual name (or symbol) for such set?
Aug
23
asked Conventions adopted for extended reals
Aug
23
answered Why is there antagonism towards extended real numbers?
Aug
23
revised Is there a name for complex numbers over affinely extended reals?
added 212 characters in body
Aug
23
comment Is there a name for complex numbers over affinely extended reals?
@Mariano Suárez-Alvarez And inverse Mellin tranform uses the both in one formula: upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/4/a/…
Aug
23
comment Is there a name for complex numbers over affinely extended reals?
@Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Look for instance at the Wiki article about Forier transform. It uses both complex numbers and signed infinities a lot: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform