331 reputation
211
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 6 months
seen Jun 6 at 8:27

Jun
4
revised Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
added 1 character in body
Jun
4
comment Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
How do you extend your answer for $a,b,c,d$ ?
Jun
4
revised Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
added 7 characters in body
Jun
4
revised Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
added 20 characters in body; edited title
Jun
4
comment Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
@Arthur of course :) that is the simplest (IMO) case, and I believe I can explain it while waving hands
Jun
4
asked Calculating the product of 3 numbers in an iterative way
May
27
awarded  Citizen Patrol
Jan
29
awarded  Notable Question
Dec
14
comment height of domino tower
Where did you plot this diagram ?
Dec
3
comment How to prove that either $2^{500} + 15$ or $2^{500} + 16$ isn't a perfect square?
@AkshajKadaveru can you explain why in quadratic residues you chose $\pmod{3}$ and $\pmod{4}$?
Nov
30
revised Gödel's ontological proof - How does it work?
edited tags
Nov
3
accepted Positive definite matrix proof - why $z^TUDU^Tz \underset {2} = \sum{d_i[U^Tz]^2_i}$ holds
Nov
3
answered Positive definite matrix proof - why $z^TUDU^Tz \underset {2} = \sum{d_i[U^Tz]^2_i}$ holds
Nov
3
revised Positive definite matrix proof - why $z^TUDU^Tz \underset {2} = \sum{d_i[U^Tz]^2_i}$ holds
added 2 characters in body
Nov
3
revised Positive definite matrix proof - why $z^TUDU^Tz \underset {2} = \sum{d_i[U^Tz]^2_i}$ holds
added 20 characters in body
Nov
3
asked Positive definite matrix proof - why $z^TUDU^Tz \underset {2} = \sum{d_i[U^Tz]^2_i}$ holds
Oct
26
comment Gödel's ontological proof - How does it work?
Would you mind to add it to your answer as well ?
Oct
26
awarded  Popular Question
Oct
26
revised Gödel's ontological proof - How does it work?
added 55 characters in body
Oct
26
comment Gödel's ontological proof - How does it work?
I am convinced, though it proves the existence of a godlike entity, it doesn't prove the uniqueness, right?