| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Philadelphia, PA | |
| age | 26 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 9 months |
| seen | May 12 at 19:58 | |
| stats | profile views | 29 |
|
May 5 |
comment |
What is the proper name of this class of rings? I guess I would just call it "an integral domain of characteristic 0"... But your statement about polynomials is not true: $R$ could also be an infinite integral domain of characteristic $p$. |
|
May 1 |
comment |
I need to diagonalize this matrix but I'm not sure it can be It can't be diagonalized, since the matrix only has one eigenvector for the double eigenvalue. You should check out "Jordan Normal Form". |
|
May 1 |
answered | Is the following problem convex? |
|
May 1 |
comment |
Is the following problem convex? It's not true in general that a composition of two convex functions is convex. See this question |
|
Mar 25 |
answered | Is there a property that isolates the formulas that remain valid as you move from the natural numbers to the integers? |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
Shortest string possible I would think it has to be 0100010. The shortest one can't have a substring that's also an instance of S. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
Count indices in summation I think inclusion-exclusion principle might help you. |
|
Jul 28 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jul 16 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jul 29 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jul 29 |
revised |
Why is the “finitely many” quantifier not definable in First Order Logic? Correction. |
|
Jul 28 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Jul 28 |
answered | Why is the “finitely many” quantifier not definable in First Order Logic? |
|
Jul 27 |
awarded | Supporter |

