929 reputation
1719
bio website wolfram.com
location United States
age 37
visits member for 3 years, 10 months
seen 11 hours ago

The gravatar was made with Mathematica, and inspired by this.

The contents of my posts are my own opinion, and do not reflect the opinions of my employer.


Aug
16
comment For this bilinear form: $q(v)=q(x_1,x_2,x_3)=x_1^2+x_2^2+9x_3^{2}+2x_1x_2-6x_1x_3-5x_2x_3$ find a base $B$ so that $[q]^B_B=D$ diagonalizable matrix
Your matrix has a mistake in it, the $x_2 x_3$ term (2.5) should be negative.
Aug
13
comment Given $A\in M_{6}$ and $f(x)=2x^9+x^8+5x^3+x+a$, for what values of $a$ is $f(A)$ invertible?
@Didier, you are correct. It assumes that $A$ is not defective, as it is here.
Aug
13
comment Given $A\in M_{6}$ and $f(x)=2x^9+x^8+5x^3+x+a$, for what values of $a$ is $f(A)$ invertible?
@Nir, what is $f(A)$ when $A$ is diagonal? Also, let $A = S^{-1}DS$, where $D$ is diagonal, then what is $A^n$? You can use those results to show that $f(\lambda)$ is an eigenvalue of $f(A)$.
Aug
9
comment Conserved Quantities in Dynamical Systems
As a point of note, this site operates on accumulated reputations which is acquired via others voting on the questions and answers you have posted and possible having your answers accepted as the best/correct one. For this system to work, you should vote on the answers you find useful, and accept those answers which best answer your questions. To do otherwise, in the long term you will eventually find your questions being ignored.
Aug
5
answered Conserved Quantities in Dynamical Systems
Aug
5
revised Conserved Quantities in Dynamical Systems
fixed typo; added LaTeX markup
Aug
5
suggested suggested edit on Conserved Quantities in Dynamical Systems
Aug
3
comment Is this Batman equation for real?
One answer, five badges: Nice Answer, Mortarboard, Good Answer, Great Answer, Guru. Nice haul all told.
Jun
12
comment Divergence as transpose of gradient?
I've been looking at those formulas for years, and that is probably the most intuitive form I've seen. To be clear, since $g$ is a "scalar", then $\nabla^T g = (\nabla g)^T$, or have I misinterpreted it?
Jun
12
comment Completing the squares for matrices
As written, the first equation does not make sense. The first term is a scalar, but the other terms are vectors, presuming that $A$ and $B$ are matrices. Does the missing $C$ fix that? In truth, none of equations make sense for the same reason.
Jun
9
comment Determine the matrix relative to a given basis
+1, didn't think of that, but I should have.
Jun
4
revised Maximizing a function by finding derivative
added align so that equation would fit in bounding box
Jun
4
suggested suggested edit on Maximizing a function by finding derivative
Jun
3
revised Limit of a Markov transition matrix
moved comma; rearranged code for clarity
Jun
3
suggested suggested edit on Limit of a Markov transition matrix
Jun
3
revised Inverting the sum of a Dense and Diagonal matrix
added additional thoughts on second question
Jun
3
comment Inverting the sum of a Dense and Diagonal matrix
@Eric, I went through the same set of trials with my research, so batting zero is average! I'd recommend the books by G. W. Stewart (1, 2). Eventually, there will be 5 volumes, but the first two alone will improve how you think about matrix problems.
Jun
3
revised Inverting the sum of a Dense and Diagonal matrix
added response to second part
Jun
2
revised Inverting the sum of a Dense and Diagonal matrix
added link to review article
Jun
2
answered Inverting the sum of a Dense and Diagonal matrix