| bio | website | none |
|---|---|---|
| location | Reutlingen, Germany | |
| age | 22 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | Feb 21 at 7:40 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
|
Jan 6 |
comment |
Proof that an inverse of a possibly noncomputable function is possibly not decidable About the first one: that's just what I meant, it's finite in either case (it doesn't depend on f's definition). |
|
Jan 6 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jan 6 |
comment |
Proof that an inverse of a possibly noncomputable function is possibly not decidable Yes, that was me. Well, I guess the answer(that f^-1 could just give me anything) just seemed a bit too "obvious" to me :) Thanks anyways. |
|
Jan 6 |
accepted | Proof that an inverse of a possibly noncomputable function is possibly not decidable |
|
Jan 6 |
asked | Proof that an inverse of a possibly noncomputable function is possibly not decidable |
|
Oct 20 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Oct 20 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Oct 20 |
revised |
Prove that a formal language is infinite added 2 characters in body |
|
Oct 20 |
accepted | Prove that a formal language is infinite |
|
Oct 20 |
awarded | Student |
|
Oct 20 |
asked | Prove that a formal language is infinite |
|
Jan 8 |
awarded | Autobiographer |