|
Aug 6 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Mar 11 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Mar 11 |
revised |
Proof of Taylor's series expansion with two terms added 41 characters in body |
|
Mar 10 |
answered | Proof of Taylor's series expansion with two terms |
|
Mar 8 |
comment |
Proof of Taylor's series expansion with two terms Thanks, this is correct indeed, but I would like to find a proof which does not use the l'Hospitals rule. I mean, something which would really only require the direct definition of the differentiation. The point is, I actually need to prove this result for a multidimensional case (but I hope that if I see the one-dimensional proof, I'll be able to easily generalize it). |
|
Mar 8 |
asked | Proof of Taylor's series expansion with two terms |
|
Dec 6 |
awarded | Student |
|
Dec 6 |
comment |
What is the constant $e$, fundamentally? A duplicate, indeed. It's sad, however, that there is still no good answer to the actual question in any of the other posts. |
|
Dec 6 |
asked | What is the constant $e$, fundamentally? |
|
Dec 6 |
awarded | Autobiographer |