George Shack
Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 75 Rep.
Set bounties
 Apr22 awarded Notable Question Oct19 awarded Popular Question Dec13 revised Symmetric and reflexive relations on an $n$-element set added 1 characters in body Dec13 asked Symmetric and reflexive relations on an $n$-element set Dec6 revised Stuck on simple relations between sets deleted 1 characters in body Dec6 awarded Commentator Dec6 awarded Editor Dec6 revised Stuck on simple relations between sets deleted 2 characters in body Dec6 asked Stuck on simple relations between sets Dec5 comment Reverse Polish Notation and numbers $>9$ OK, thank you :) Dec5 accepted Reverse Polish Notation and numbers $>9$ Dec5 asked Reverse Polish Notation and numbers $>9$ Nov23 accepted GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Nov23 comment GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Yep, I see it now, it's senseless to assign some true-false value to d here, thank you :) Nov23 comment GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Ooh, I see. Thank you a lot :) Nov23 comment GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Hm... So something like $d=\forall_{k}(...)$? It doesn't look right to me but I never did quantifier-things with an equal sign between so maybe it's right... Is it? Nov23 comment GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Oh, I see. Thank you a lot. But how can I use the quantifiers to show such a statement? I mean: I can't just do $d=$ and write down all the rest so how should one do it? Also, thank you a lot for the disclaimer about d dividing a,b,c - shamefully, I don't remember if I wrote that down or not :) Nov23 asked GCD using quantifiers - where did I make a mistke? Dec11 awarded Tumbleweed Dec11 awarded Supporter