1,243 reputation
67
bio website
location New York City
age 41
visits member for 3 years, 2 months
seen 5 hours ago

My mathematical prejudices: 1. I don't accept choice on the continuum 2. I accept choice on countable collections, as well as countable infinity. 3. I don't think of the continuum as small enough to be a set, 4. I think every subclass (subset) of the real line is measurable, 5. I prefer constructions to abstractions. In this, I hope I am following Paul Cohen in spirit.

my dream theorem is a proof of the consistency of ZFC from a countable computable ordinal, as explicitly describable as possible, which plays the same role for ZFC as $\epsilon_0$ does for PA. This would complete Hilbert's program, giving what I would consider a finitary proof of the consistency of set theory. If you think this is impossible because of Godel's theorem, you haven't understood Godel's theorem fully. The problem is that ordinal naming schemes crap out much too early for this to work with an explicit construction with today's methods.


This user has not asked any questions
Physics 59,510 rep 482203
Philosophy 1,778 rep 716
Mathematics 1,243 rep 67
Biblical Hermeneutics 1,081 rep 1620
Christianity 686 rep 49

24 Votes Cast

all time   by type  
17 up 12 question
7 down 12 answer